Sears Agrees To Pay CSC Undisclosed Amount To End IT Dispute

Written by Evan Schuman
October 22nd, 2007

Sears Holdings and the Computer Sciences Corp. ended a multi-year IT-outsourcing contract dispute on Monday, with few details released excerpt perhaps the most meaningful one: Sears is paying CSC.

"Sears and CSC have amicably settled their differences on mutually satisfactory terms, with Sears paying an undisclosed amount to CSC," said the brief statement, issued just before 10 PM (EST).

Back in May 2004, Sears hired CSC for a $1.6 billion 10-year IT outsourcing package. Some 11 months later, shortly after the Sears and Kmart merger, Sears wanted out of the deal.

That’s where the facts start to diverge. The CSC version has Sears pushing to end the contract just shy of its one-year agreement, as a "convenience" to avoid a $96 million killfee. By canceling it before the one-year mark, its early termination penalty would have only been $58 million.

Sears’ version has CSC having performed quite poorly and that it was terminated for cause.

The brief statement offers few clues for which side blinked. The statement said "CSC does not expect to experience a charge associated with the impairment of assets related to the Sears/CSC agreement," which means relatively little. The joint statement was issued by CSC with contact information for both sides.

Sears Holdings also said that it didn’t expect the results to be material on its side, either. "Because Holdings established a reserve for the expected settlement by Sears, Holdings does not expect that the settlement will have a material effect on its 2007 (or full year) earnings. Holdings also does not expect the settlement to have a material effect on its financial position."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.