Macy’s Self-Service Makeup Centers Could Go Much Farther

Written by Evan Schuman
May 6th, 2010

When reports hit this week that Macy’s was trialing self-service makeup centers—to be called Impulse Beauty—at about 15 locations, we initially thought the retailer was leveraging kiosks. Alas, nothing so digital is going on at Macy’s. But the potential for replacing pancake with pixels is quite real.

Envision a customer walking up to a kiosk, looking into a mirror and smiling. The mirror digitally captures the customer’s face. With the captured face on a screen, the customer chooses makeup options.

Those choices could be made on a computer screen (iPad app anyone?) or, better yet, via RFID tags affixed to the samples—similar to the efforts of some Japanese retailers. A customer picks up one lipstick and that option appears on the screen. It can be applied to the face on the screen, saved and then compared with a half-dozen other shades, side by side.

At a click, those images could be E-mailed (or texted) to the customer or posted on a password-protected Web page. Or, if the customer has the right free app on her PDA, the kiosk could even beam the images directly to the customer’s phone via Bluetooth. From there, it’s a click for the customer to share them with friends and family for instant feedback before making her final choices.

This approach would need to deal with lighting issues (perhaps a pull-down menu with a dozen lighting options, such as office, moonlight stroll, spotlight on stage, etc.?) on the screen in addition to lighting issues in the store. The screen’s resolution itself also must be carefully chosen so the images shown are as realistic as possible. This is fine technology as long as it doesn’t fuel huge returns when the makeup looks quite different in the natural light outside.

It would be nice to also allow for other images to be offered, such as if the person was trying to buy for a romantic partner, sister, daughter, mother, co-worker, etc.

The creativity behind such an app would have no limits. Perhaps an option to change hair color to see how different rouge shades would look if the customer morphed from brunette to blonde or from blonde to redhead?

When stores remove the sales associate from the picture, it can be a good thing only if there’s something persuasive and helpful as a replacement. A kiosk can deliver data in a permanent and sharable fashion, all without a benefits plan.


2 Comments | Read Macy’s Self-Service Makeup Centers Could Go Much Farther

  1. cestmoi Says:

    Sounds like a futuristic shopping mall experience; however, wouldn’t this intrude on personal biometrics? These businesses will have your biometric signature and thus open themselves up to endless fraudulent possibilities.

  2. mh Says:

    Would the kiosk really be able to accurately apply the makeup to the image, or will it look like someone hacked the image with a microsoft paint paintbrush?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.