Carrefour, World’s Second Largest Retailer, Makes Major Contactless Endorsement

Written by Evan Schuman
February 11th, 2010

Although contactless payment is going through a tough time in the U.S. these days, its global efforts got a huge boost this month. Europe’s largest chain—French grocery giant Carrefour—announced the purchase of 12,000 EMV contactless PIN pads, with immediate plans to deploy the pads “at 210 of its French hypermarkets, as well as at all of Carrefour’s petrol stations in France.” The world’s second-largest retailer’s latest contactless deployment, which started in October 2009 but wasn’t announced until last Thursday (Feb. 4), is using readers from Hypercom, the chain said. The vendor would only describe Carrefour’s investment as “multi-million dollar.”

Domestically, contactless is having problems, with Best Buy kicking out Visa’s contactless program and Discover having its own technical problems with contactless . Even many of the U.S. chains that have deployed contactless have done so very unenthusiastically, including Home Depot and Subway.


One Comment | Read Carrefour, World’s Second Largest Retailer, Makes Major Contactless Endorsement

  1. David Dorf Says:

    Contactless payment just doesn’t do anything for me as a consumer. The difference between waving my card and swiping my card is negligible. Now from a retailer’s perspective I imagine fraud can be significantly reduced, but does the savings outweigh the required investment? On the other hand, I think near-field technology in mobile phones can be leveraged in lots of places in the store, not just the checkout stand. That will be much more interesting.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.