Companies Find Workarounds for RFID Roadblocks

Written by Evan Schuman
April 27th, 2005

Retailers and consumer goods manufacturers experimenting with RFID are still seeing higher-than-expected error rates, but they are starting to work out low-tech workarounds, according to a major European RFID analyst company that has analyzed about 1,400 recent radio-frequency identification trials.

The most common problem has been reader interference coming from either metal or fluid, which was a major problem for The Gillette Co. in trying to scan its razor blades, said Raghu Das, a managing director at IDTechEx Ltd., which created the report.

Even Philip Morris International Inc. found that the thin metal on the paper wrapping it uses to surround certain cigarettes was causing problems, Das said.

He added that the tobacco giant admitted that the paper?perceived as enhancing freshness?didn’t serve any purpose, but that it would have been too expensive to redo the packaging.

Kleenex-maker Kimberly-Clark Corp. accidentally discovered a simple workaround, Das said. During normal assembly-line operations, all pallets are fully shrink-wrapped. The machinery that does this slowly spins the pallet around.

The company discovered that an RFID scan taken during that rotation delivered much more accurate reads, Das said, apparently because it allowed the reader to “see” the tags from different angles and grab the best view.

But testing also has raised the possibility that putting more distance between the tag and the interfering material by using certain kinds of shrink-wrapping or substrates (surfaces where labels/tags can be printed or placed) could play a role in reducing errors, Das said.

Based on the RFID trials that IDTechEx was able to identify, the United States is still overwhelmingly dominant, attributable mostly to Wal-Mart. Of all of the RFID trials the analyst firm found around the planet, one out of three are in the U.S. The top 10 countries were the United States (with 456 trials); the United Kingdom (145 trials); Japan (104); Germany (64); China (54); France (45); The Netherlands (36); Korea (32); Italy (26); and Canada (25).

Those numbers can be misleading, though, as they do not necessarily reflect industry investment. In Korea, for example, the government directly provided the money for 15 of those trials, Das said, adding that a government’s interest is in strengthening the future economy and less of the quarter-to-quarter, quick return-on-investment mentality that often dominates corporate America and the U.K.

The initial uses of RFID in deployment are not the EPC product identification types that get so much publicity but instead are more practical, such as Mobil SpeedPass and E-ZPass in the United States.

“In the value of the tags and infrastructure, the RFID business remains focused on smart card/payments and key fobs,” the report said. “The largest projects have not involved EPC tags, and they include the $6 billion China national ID card scheme and the delivery last year of 50 million RFID tickets for the Osaka World Fair by Toppan Printing using Hitachi Mu Solutions RFID inlets.”

The study also challenges another RFID assumption. A high-tech industry that is used to projecting prices according to Moore’s Law?Intel’s Gordon Moore’s theory that transistor capabilities would double every couple of years?assumed that RFID chip prices would fall as deployments kicked in, with the only questions being, “How far and how fast?”

But as companies think through RFID strategies, they are coming up with new uses, often requiring more sophisticated and costly chips. Unlike a PC or a server, the amount of space for even an extra dot of silicon is quite restricted on the typical RFID chip.

The report offers as an example a United Nations effort to make passports more secure and consistent. “The passport scheme involves about 30 countries and 300 passports working at high frequency. It has gotten off to a slow start, but it will rise in importance in the next three years, perhaps reaching 20 million yearly. That may not seem much, but?like most RFID smart cards?these labels and inserts cost 15 times as much as a retailer’s EPC tag,” the report said.

“The chip alone costs two dollars in a passport because of the large memory, sophisticated security and use of a microprocessor. RFID smart cards also have sophisticated security and microprocessors,” the report said.

“The China ID card is an exception as it has hardwired logic and no microprocessor, but it still costs $1.25, 6.25 times the cost of today’s retailer’s EPC tag, and the gap will widen as EPC tags sell in larger numbers and their costs tumble further.”

Another report example is one where the chips need to be more expensive because they need to be ruggedized, so as to withstand extreme temperature, humidity or extensive wear-and-tear. Laws mandating animal tagging for slaughter were given as an example.

“It may be that the high unit price of animal tags will, together with legislation in many countries mandating their use on livestock, lead to this being the second-largest market for RFID tags by value this year,” the report said.

“But although we note suppliers of these low-frequency tags with necessarily sophisticated encapsulation for ruggedness, biocompatibility, etc. are doubling and trebling output, that may or may not be enough for demand, and case studies of the tags in action are difficult to obtain.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.