Device Lets POS Units Handle Wireless Transactions

Written by Evan Schuman
October 18th, 2004

With wireless uncertainty as its staunch ally, Vivotech on Monday will introduce a system to help retailers quickly convert existing POS units to accept wireless entries.

The reason some retailers may find this an attractive option is, ironically, because their interest in contactless payment approaches is lukewarm. If the interest was nil, then there would be no need to change. If the interest was extremely high, retailers would be more inclined to make permanent upgrades to their systems, buying POS (point of sale) units designed to handle contactless transactions.

But in the current environment where retailers are somewhat interested, a lower-cost allegedly easy-to-install system could find its niche quickly.

Vivotech’s entry to this space is a $165 5-by-4.2-inch unit to be called the Vivopay 4000.

The small piece of hardware?there is no software to install, merely programming hardwired into the device?uses a dynamic strip to connect the retailer’s existing POS device with the Vivopay 4000. It essentially tricks the existing POS unit into thinking that it’s seeing a magstripe card swipe when it’s actually receiving input from a key fob, a cell phone, an infrared device or an RF-enabled credit card.

Vivotech executives stress that changing an existing POS system is extremely cumbersome?with banks and credit card firms involved?so this technology may remove a point of resistance for retailers who want to experiment with contactless payments.

Vivotech President Mohammad Khan said the same circumstances hit merchants who were trying to push smart cards a few years ago. “This is the main reason the smart card was not successful in the U.S. It was because the smart card implementation required changing the point of sale, and merchants were not willing to make such a huge investment,” he said.

Jupiter Research analyst Bruce Cundiff agreed with Khan that the large required investments to upgrade POS are causing quite a few retailers to hesitate. “I definitely agree with them providing this bridge. There certainly is a need for this,” Cundiff said, adding that it’s mostly because “the jury is still out on whether proximity payments will take off.”

The contactless readers themselves are slow migrating to new areas, such as fast food, and they are starting to be well-ingrained in other areas, such as gas stations.

But for this device to sell, Khan has to become a salesperson for the contactless movement and make the business case to retailers that contactless will make them money. He argues, for example, that customers are statistically likely to spend 20 percent more money when using a contactless device.

Jupiter’s Cundiff maintains the argument must be made because “you’re going to have a tough time migrating the merchant infrastructure until you can make a very compelling business case. For a [larger] retailer, you’re talking about millions of dollars of investment.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.