Don’t Mess Around with Good Acronyms

Written by Evan Schuman
April 21st, 2005

A third definition for “POS” is two too many for this columnist. Beware the ides of DEC.

The high-tech industry in general?and retail IT is certainly no exception?loves acronyms. The more obtuse, the better. Engineers, designers and programmers come up with them because it’s fun. Marketing execs use them to simultaneously impress and baffle customers. And PR people use them because … well … the young ones don’t know any better.

But there are a handful of acronyms that have actual meanings and are widely understood; so to try to change an age-old acronym for a marketing spin is nothing shy of evil. In the dictionary next to “evil,” there should be pictures of Hitler, Bin Laden, a cartoon of Boris Badenoff tying a girl to a railroad track and some marketer coming up with new meanings for CRM, ATM or POS.

POS, BTW, stands for “point of sale” and that’s the way the universe wants it. Last year, Microsoft?the dastardly king of the bad acronym makers?started using POS to refer to “point of service.”

Microsoft had a legitimate point?that mobile devices can be used to help customers learn about prospects and might not necessarily execute a sale?but why not use some other letter combination to communicate this new concept? Why burden your branding effort by first forcing retail IT execs to unlearn what they have learned?

Not only that, but this week, I received an e-mail from a company calling itself Prescient Applied Intelligence that it is trying to sell a new “POS audit tool,” only these folks are defining POS as “pay on scan.”

What did the company do? Throw in every combination for those letters and then?please forgive me?take POS luck? (My apologies, but that was a pun that I simply couldn’t POS up.)

This reminds me of one of this industry’s most absurd acronym battles. For decades, the venerable Digital Equipment Corp. dominated the server industry (called minis at the time) with its DEC VAX line.

The term “DEC” was known throughout the industry generally with good connotations. When times got tough and DEC started stumbling during the 1990s, its marketing people decided that their company would no longer be known as DEC; instead it would be referred to as Digital.

First, after decades of being known by one acronym, you can’t simply decide that everyone must switch. If DEC wanted to change its name, it had every right to do so, but you can’t force a new nickname on the industry.

But if DEC did want to change its nickname, why choose something so amazingly generic as “digital,” as in digital watch or digital camera? I won’t say that that move hastened DEC’s demise, but it certainly didn’t slow it down any.

What if IBM marketing decided?at its depth when mainframes were being threatened?that it wanted everyone to call the company “International”? How well do you think that would have gone over?

As a technology writer, my job is to try to make sense out of industry ramblings and extract and communicate the shreds of actual information. Terms like “point of sale” communicate actual information. It’s incredibly valuable in an industry where meaningless technobabble is common.

If you want to effectively communicate information to IT executives and you start repurposing existing widely accepted acronyms, your branding program will learn about another great acronym: FUBAR.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.