Grocery Chain Connects TV Tracking And POS Data

Written by Evan Schuman
April 16th, 2009

A grocery chain has gotten involved in a deal where it is sharing extensive POS customer data with a business that is marrying that data with those same consumers’ entertainment-watching history. The goal? To overlay the two to see what those consumers are buying after they watch certain entertainment shows or commercials.

In this particular effort, the retailer has chosen to mask the individual consumer identities—for now—and is trying to draw general conclusions based on the actions of people in that Zip Code. But the technology was there for them to tie everything back to the individual consumer, raising quite a few data and privacy strategy issues.

This grocery project involved digital video record (DVR) data, but it could have just as easily been the more extensive data available from cable, satellite or other broadband entertainment companies. Many of those companies already provide phone and Internet access. How complete a consumer profile would be possible just merging the data from two companies, if it’s a broadband firm plus a prominent retailer?

“From a pure technology point of view, the ability is already in place today that would allow vendors to capture data detailing individuals’ viewing and buying habits to a granular level and would allow them to perform data analytics using high-performance databases that uncover specific predictive patterns,” said John Thompson, CEO of Kognitio’s North American operations, which is one of the companies involved in this grocery project. Kognitio is providing the analytical database. “If those patterns were used, and there’s no indication that anyone is doing so, they could be used to target individual consumers.”

The grocery setup allows as much as 50-TBytes of data to be collected for various targets, Thompson said, which is quite ample for creating a wonderfully comprehensive profile.

Today, such efforts are limited only by the retribution fears of the retail execs involved. There are no practical technological limits nor are there many significant laws prohibiting such sharing and analytics. Even the privacy policies that most consumers sign are designed to protect the retailer and not the consumer so those shouldn’t pose any collection hardship. So what is halting them? It’s the fear that consumers will get very angry with them.

This gets us to a key point. There are two perception issues at play here. The first is what the retail managers and executives think will alienate consumers and the second is whether those consumers will in fact believe it’s a privacy violation that they’d find objectionable.

Clearly, the demographics—especially age and education—of the consumers have to be closely examined. For a true GenY audience, privacy is barely a factor, as anyone who has recently visited YouTube, MySpace and Facebook understands. And even for older consumers who might feel more strongly about privacy, it’s a question of incentives. Are you willing to offer 10 percent off all purchases for consumers who participate in a trial? Putting a pricetag on privacy is not hard. Finding the money to pay for it is.

Let’s go back to those two groups. Historically, the retail manager will likely project his/her own beliefs on consumers, which is fine if that manager shares the same demographics as those consumers. But if it’s a 54-year-old Ph.D male, his gut instinct on the privacy sensitivities of the 16-year-old girls buying the clothing in his store may not be fine-tuned. If that manager turns to focus groups and consumer surveys to figure out those answers, the distance between that manager and the truth gets much wider.

It’s likely those consumers will be ready to make those privacy deals a lot sooner than the retailers will expect. And a few early opt-in programs with generous incentives may prove to be quite eye-opening.


One Comment | Read Grocery Chain Connects TV Tracking And POS Data

  1. James Loar Says:

    There seems to be an expression in the article “Grocery Chain Connects TV Tracking And POS Data” that reminds me of the WALL of separation described between the FBI and CIA after the 9/11 hearings. Here now the advertiser is trying to link their efforts to the actual results (sales). So it seems that through the technology they would, for example, see how many times a household saw their advertisement (customer link via cable company collecting usage data). Then they need to get the sales data via the grocery store loyalty card purchase information. So the execs are afraid that people will be upset for them breaching the WALL of privacy. Well I guess we need to rethinnk the privacy and what that loyalty card discount is really buying us. Is it worth the half-price or free turkey?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.