Guitar Center Gets Behind PayPal In A Big Way, And For A Good Reason

Written by Evan Schuman
November 15th, 2012

When 235-store Guitar Center agreed to a PayPal proposal to offer the alternative payment method inside its stores, the music chain had very good reason to believe its shoppers would embrace PayPal in a way that the customers of other in-store PayPal retailers—including Home Depot, JCPenney, Abercrombie & Fitch, Toys”R”Us, Foot Locker and Barnes & Noble—might not. Musicians spend a lot of time buying and selling used instruments and audio gear on eBay, which means most have a healthy amount of PayPal dollars in their accounts.

Giving those shoppers an in-store option to use that PayPal currency, a place that has used (along with new) instruments and audio equipment and where said equipment can be touched and listened to before being purchased, made a lot of sense to Wes Muddle, Guitar Center’s VP for Finance. So it’s not surprising that the chain made it a priority to let every customer know about the PayPal option, through lots of store signage and associate training. And, gasp, Guitar Center is even considering offering cash incentives—though it would much rather PayPal do that instead.

The PayPal option started September 24, and Muddle has said the number of customers who are actually trying it has been small but steadily increasing. “It’s been growing every week. It’s few, but it has been growing,” he said. “It’s not anything that moves the needle, but there’s been no promotions around it yet. So once the marketing and promotions machines fully kick in, we expect that number to increase significantly.” Muddle declined to say what the actual numbers are.

The PayPal integration at Guitar Center was implemented by AJB Software Design. Shoppers have the option of using a PayPal card or entering in their mobile phone number and a 4-digit PIN. That’s just for the large chains. PayPal is only offering the more interesting functionality—such as identifying customers automatically when they arrive and authenticating them with headshots—for small boutique shops.

As with all the other early adopters, PayPal has absorbed a very high percentage of the cost of deployment at Guitar Center. Unlike the first couple of chains, though, Muddle said PayPal didn’t cover all the costs. “PayPal has assisted us in this process, but not to 100 percent,” he said.

The next big stage is to start offering specific shopper incentives to use PayPal, “whether it’s a percentage off or a dollar off or a two-for-one deal,” Muddle said. “We have not planned on that type of promotion yet, but it is something that is in our arsenal,” he said, adding that PayPal has also discussed doing its own incentives. Muddle would rather see that happen first and see how it plays out with his customers.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.