Is Giant Eagle’s Forced Self-Checkout CRM Tactic Smart?

Written by Evan Schuman
April 8th, 2013

Some Giant Eagle stores have started blocking access to self-checkout for anyone other than loyalty card holders while they are using their cards. It’s an interesting move, in that it simultaneously discourages self-checkout usage but also gathers far more information about those who do opt to self-checkout, CRM-style.

For the last couple of years, retailers have had this intense love-hate relationship with self-checkout. Chains have touted “customer service” as their reason both for yanking the self-checkout units out and for adding more of them. Higher theft rates have been reported in some stores and not others. Much of it is like any other retail IT deployment, influenced sharply by how much attention is paid to the deployment and how the customers in different neighborhoods—based on demographics—react to the machines.

But the idea of requiring CRM to self-checkout is a new twist. Chains—and that’s triply true for grocery—have always struggled getting shoppers to use their loyalty cards. To be fair, many of those difficulties have been self-inflicted. We’ve seen many associates offering to scan generic loyalty cards to give the discounts to non-cardholders. (Note: The very concept of a generic CRM card is the quintessential oxymoron.) Even worse, we’ve seen some stores that actively discourage card use. The associates will stop customers trying to pull out the cards, saying, “That’s not necessary. The discounts are being added automatically.”

By forcing all self-checkout shoppers to use the cards, Giant Eagle could be testing how shoppers react to the cards when they are mandatory. Will they rebel or passively comply? If they comply, could requiring CRM at other lanes be a possibility? Or is the thinking less severe, with merely the hope that by forcing people to use CRM in some parts of the store, they’ll start using the cards in all of the store voluntarily?

In other words, once shoppers get used to the extra discounts and other services, will they stick with it always?

The story quoted Giant Eagle spokesperson Dick Roberts saying: “Scanning a Giant Eagle Advantage Card ensures that customers receive all available weekly specials, fuel perks, personalized register coupon offers and other savings, while also making available vital customer contact information in the instance of a product recall.”

Those are all true and helpful, but for Giant Eagle to benefit, it is going to have to work at making those benefits happen routinely. Customers need to see those recall notices before they read about them online, assuming it impacts them. Better yet, how about a comforting note about a recall? Something like, “You might have heard about a large recall of canned mushrooms today. Rest assured that we checked and your mushrooms are not part of the recall. Thank you for shopping at Giant Eagle and a particularly large thanks for using your loyalty card. As long as you keep using it, we can keep protecting you.”

There are other useful aspects of this program. One of the key problems with self-checkout is that most of the systems were designed for 10 or fewer products. The untrained consumer scanner is simply too slow to efficiently move many more items through the line. When the item count moves into double digits, it’s in everyone’s interest—the store, the shopper and particularly the people in line behind the shopper—for that shopper to be encouraged to use the staffed lanes.

Signs indicating this are nice, but a CRM problem allows for contact information to be associated with the shoppers who are sluggishly scanning 59 items. What the stores does with that information is a test of diplomatic skills, but with a CRM self-checkout program, at least the store has a chance to do something.


4 Comments | Read Is Giant Eagle’s Forced Self-Checkout CRM Tactic Smart?

  1. Miels Thomas Says:

    Forced CRM is a feature of most wand-based “Scan as you Shop” systems, so this is not a big change

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    That’s absolutely correct, but I wouldn’t say that it’s not a big change. It’s more correct to say that a forced CRM move is not without precedent. The reason it’s still a “big change” involves shopper expectations. That CRM requirement has been a given since the very earliest such devices (think ShopppingBuddy) so it’s not a change at all. But self-checkout machines, to our knowledge, have never required CRM so it’s a huge change for all of the people who are used to using self-checkout.

  3. Bob Skattum Says:

    I think that if this is coupled with loyalty card based discounts, that it could train (aka force) the customer to use the card more frequently. Perhaps incorporating a line-buster program with hand scanners could also be offered only to loyalty card holders … something akin to Costco’s method of scanning cart contents before you get to register.

    Although I am not a Giant Eagle customer, it does appear that at least they have an electronic representation of the customer’s loyalty card on their smartphone apps. That is one of the primary “gripes” I have with Safeway’s loyalty app because my older card with a defective mag stripe must always be scanned, or I have to enter my phone number to access personalized offers and rewards. It would be interesting to see how well their self-service scanners read the smartphone card number … as I notice it doesn’t always work as promised in the Walgreen’s app.

  4. kevin mitnick Says:

    This is a complete invasion of privacy! Big Buzzard will want you to put 666 on your body next or no service. You should be aloud to opt out of data mining if you choose so. I say if the Buzzard wants the data give them false data. A database full of false data is worth less than used TP.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.