McDonald’s: Want VOIP with That?

Written by Evan Schuman
January 26th, 2005

A hungry consumer pulls up to the drive-through window in a California McDonald’s restaurant and places a dinner order. The person taking the order points out that the caller placed only three drink orders for four dinners and reminds the diner of a special that day on apple pie.

This might be a fairly typical fast-food?or, in industry parlance, QSR for quick-service restaurant?exchange were it not for the fact that the customer and the order-taker are dozens of miles apart, connected through a VPN-secured voice-over-IP hookup.

Although it’s unlikely to ever replace the chain’s once-famous slogan, “you deserve a break-even today” is more in line with the financial motivation behind the initial nine-store experiment.

The move leverages efficiencies in the ordering process, even factoring in the rush-hour delay between one order being completed and the time it takes for the next car to pull up and roll down the window.

“When we had two stores, we had to have two people. At six stores, even at the busiest times, five people could handle it,” said Doug King, president of Bronco Communications Inc., who is managing the McDonald’s experiment. “At nine stores, the efficiencies get greater and greater. At nine stores, we can manage it with six, assuming a manager is nearby to handle the periodic overflow.”

Underneath the sesame seed bun is an assortment of PC-based current technology?VOIP riding on a 768K DSL connection through a VPN, all headed to a proprietary patent-pending voice-order-processor.

Turning ketchup packets into voice packets is made all the more difficult because of their having to connect with out-of-date drive-through speaker and microphone systems.

“We’re using VOIP to talk through the existing speaker input and these things are of all different vintages,” King said. “The speaker boxes, some of them have been out there for literally 20 or 30 years. They are using all different kinds of mics, including some that still use ‘push to talk’ technology. We’ve developed our own hardware interface that lets us standardly connect with all of those systems.”

King argues, however, that the call center drive-through approach is not merely a factor of efficiency. The position answering those drive-through calls is “the absolute hardest to train. It involves knowing the menu and knowing all the buttons,” King said, as well as understanding short- and long-term special promotions such as offering two apple pies for a dollar.

“Today’s thing is if they order a Big Mac, to ask them if they want it in a meal,” King said. “Spotting the deficiencies in an order?such as if they didn’t order a drink?is critical.”

King’s position is that a call center allows for greater training and employees who can focus fully on the calls, and that doing all of this will leverage a call center’s inherent efficiency.

After this initial experiment, King said, he wants to move this effort beyond drive-throughs and use kiosks to move into other locations, such as restaurants within malls or where a drive-through is prohibited.

The system also has a backup system. When McDonald’s hardware detects a car pulling up, it alerts the call center to start the process. If there is a problem?either because of a network outage or excessive congestion at the call center?the system automatically plays a voice recording asking customers to please wait.

If no response comes within 30 seconds, it plays a second message asking the customer to the move to the first window where the order is taken manually. Store employees then quickly revert and put on their old headsets and take over order-taking until the call center is reconnected.

Just such a problem happened on Tuesday, when the company’s ISP suffered some routing problems between SBC Communications and MCI, said Glen Miller, general manager at Bronco. The problem was resolved when calls were moved to an AT&T pipe.

“We couldn’t take orders for four hours,” Miller said. “It was the longest outage we have had.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.