Prices Plummet for Point-of-Sale Systems

Written by Evan Schuman
March 9th, 2005

With causes ranging from new, low-priced vendors to needing more lanes open simultaneously, IHL Consulting Group is reporting that prices for typical point-of-sale base units in North America have been plummeting, from about $2,200 in 2002 to $950 last year.

At the same time, the number of POS systems sold also sharply increased?about 12 percent?to a little more than 1 million units, said Lee Holman, one of the report’s authors and vice president of product development at IHL.

When software, services and various POS-related peripherals are factored in, that amounts to a roughly $6.5 billion market for 2004, with an expectation of an “even bigger” market for 2005, IHL said.

Greg Buzek, the report’s other author and president of IHL, said the POS growth extended across many retail segments. Last year “was an outstanding year of unit growth for vendors, particularly in specialty stores, table service restaurants and super centers,” he said.

“Looking ahead, our research indicates that every segment of the retail industry will increase its POS purchases in 2005 over 2004, as retailers upgrade to more reliable and easier-to-use systems.”

Around 2001 and 2002, many of the POS price reductions were based on improving supply-chain efficiencies, with vendors reducing their costs and passing along a small portion of those savings to customers, Holman said.

But IHL attributed many of the recent price reductions to responses from POS industry veterans?especially IBM and NCR Corp.?to POS newcomers, especially Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co., which introduced lower-priced systems.

“The very fact that HP and Dell have entered the market has driven the cost down,” Holman said in an interview. “Simply by including Dell or HP in the mix, that forces the other vendors to drive their prices down. Prior to Dell and HP entering, there was no reason for vendors to have a hardball price, and there was no reason to have to cut their prices significantly.”

Another industry change is the debundling of POS and supporting peripherals and systems. Historically, when retailers would upgrade, replace or add new POS units, “he would buy all his stuff?including scanners, printers, monitors and so on?from the same vendor,” Holman said.

“As retailers have become more savvy with their technology,” he said, they have started keeping their peripherals and not replacing them just because they are buying new POS units.

That means that they can get months and sometimes additional years of service out of those peripherals, which reduces their total POS-related expenditures. That has also made it more difficult for vendors to pad POS prices.

An unexpected finding in the POS report, Holman said, involved IBM. The company has taken a lot of heat recently for its declining PC and laptop sales, a move that has culminated in IBM selling much of that business to China’s Lenovo Group Ltd.

Part of that PC group includes IBM’s retail store systems group, which includes POS sales. Those retail sales “have been going in the opposite direction from the rest of the PC business,” Holman said. When the sale to Lenovo completes, IBM “is going to have a chance to focus even more on POS” issues.

Although IBM received a lot of publicity for losing the Publix POS account last year to HP, it received less attention when it won significant new retail accounts, including Circuit City, Sears and Pep Boys, Holman said.

Another finding in the report is that Linux is continuing to grow in retail, increasing about 34 percent in 2004 compared with 2003, account for some 6 percent of the overall market. “It’s not a significant piece of the pie yet, as you’re still talking about small numbers,” Holman said.

Linux in retail “is expected to rise dramatically in coming years,” said a statement issued by IHL. Holman said he expects specifically to see continued growth for Linux retail, especially with convenience stores, specialty retailers and the hospitality industry.

Holman saw 2004 Linux retail activity as having been helped by IBM’s decision to embrace SuSE Linux as the preferred operating system for its POS units.

“That’s a big deal for somebody that has historically had this proprietary operating system,” he said, adding that IBM support “is going to be a bright spot for any retailer who is thinking about Linux.”

Shipments of Windows 2000/XP-based terminals represented 56 percent of the overall market. Windows 9x/CE represented another 15 percent of the shipments for a total of 71 percent of the market.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.