Report: Self-Service To Top $1.7 Trillion By 2012

Written by Evan Schuman
June 19th, 2008

North American self-service transactions will process $607 billion this year, a figure that is projected to soar to $1.7 trillion by 2012, according to a report published Wednesday (June 18) by the IHL Group.

When IHL began work on the report, "I did not expect the acceleration that we’re seeing in the out years," said IHL President Greg Buzek. "I did not expect how fast it’s growing."

Ironically, Buzek said, the jump in later years is being partially caused by the sales slowdowns of today. As dollars are getting tighter, retailers are pushing more sales through less-labor-costly self-checkout systems and paying for the installation of more such systems. Those additional machines, over the years, will increase the number of dollars being processed by self-service.

Also, IHL is seeing self-service units moving into different kinds of retailers, beyond the initial grocery deployments. That will likely cause the average self-service transaction size to increase, which was another key factor in the higher projections, Buzek said.

Not all self-service systems are expected to do as well. Self-checkout systems are projected to process about $161 billion this year and $446 billion in 2012; ticketing kiosks will hit about $298 billion this year and then soar to $1.2 trillion in 2012; check-in kiosks will hit $44 billion this year and then actually drop to $32 billion in 2012; food ordering kiosks will eat some $31 billion this year and then climb to $48 billion in 2012; and postal kiosks will stamp some $308 million this year and then climb to $419 million in 2012.

The projected actual drop with check-in kiosks seemed unusual and Buzek said it was impacted by quite a few factors, but the evolving definitions of check-in kiosks were ticketing kiosks impacted it more than anything else.

The explanation starts with stressing that this is based on revenue and not on the number of units. Also, if a consumer goes to the Web (or calls a toll-free number, for that matter) and buys a ticket or a hotel reservation and then uses the kiosk to merely check-in and pick up the ticket, IHL chose to not include those dollars in their calculations. "We only count the additional revenue such as meals, etc.," Buzek said.

Another factor: IHL made the assumption that airline downsizing—mergers, acquisitions, severe cutbacks, etc.—will likely cause a direct reduction in the number of kiosks. Continental, for example, may yank their kiosks from cities they no longer use, he said. Although IHL sees an increase in the number of hotel check-in kiosks, it’s not enough to overcome the loss of the airline units, especially if those kiosks are merely confirming Web purchases.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.