Restaurant CIO: Would You Like Wi-Fi with That?

Written by Evan Schuman
August 13th, 2005

A major regional fast-food chain?with 433 restaurants in the Southeastern United States?is going to offer free wireless connections to anyone who wants to surf while sitting in a burger joint.

The Krystal Co. (the nation’s second-oldest fast-food restaurant chain, founded in 1932) is clearly hoping that a lot of customers will be intrigued and will munch on a burger and fries while gulping from its unlimited refill 802.11 fountain.

But for CIO David Reid, the challenge lay in getting the wireless system installed and supported for as little money?and with as little operational disruption?as possible.

The idea of offering a wireless option came when Krystal officials noticed that University of Tennessee campuses?which some Krystal restaurants are near?had gone fully wireless.

“We thought, ‘If we could draw some faculty and students over there by being wireless as well,'” the chain could do some extra business, Reid said. And the installations would be “plug-and-play and simple and repeatable.”

As luck would have it, the chain had already decided to upgrade restaurants’ network connections to a variety of DSL and cable modem broadband hookups to accelerate credit card, inventory and transaction data communications.

“Because we were having a technician visiting the restaurants anyway,” Reid said, the wireless setups were relatively easy, “and so cost-effective, the way we’ve implemented them.”

Krystal is privately held and has about 7,500 employees and about $400 million in annual revenue, Reid said.

To keep things low in cost and easier to manage, Reid’s department proposed making the service free. Although that certainly made the marketing component of the wireless access more attractive?after all, the goal of the program is to sell more hamburgers?the driving force for the recommendation was IT logistics.

“When you try charging for wireless access, a huge percentage of the costs involves handling the payment. Who has paid and who hasn’t paid?” Reid said, pointing out that password management, billing, time-tracking and security focused on keeping non-paying customers off the system can get complicated and costly.

“So much time and effort involved in that and so little gain. It’s so much easier to just make it free. To us, it just looked obvious. To just collect a few dollars when it’s not even proven that it does have an impact on sales” didn’t make sense, he said.

Reid said he personally believes the wireless service will boost sales. “We know that there are many cases of people coming to our restaurant solely because we’re wireless,” he said. “I really see the wireless is absolutely a differentiator. We’re the only fast-food chain that has that in every one of our restaurants. And it’s free.”

Greg Buzek, president of IHL Consulting Group Inc., said he sees the move as a win-win.

The cost analysis for offering the service for free “makes sense if you’re going to offer wireless service. The incentive is wireless service. And it’s even more of an incentive if it’s free,” IHL Consulting’s Buzek said.

“And if it’s free, there could be more traffic than if there were a charge for the service. It makes total sense. The retailer could just drop in a router.”

Buzek added that offering a free service also reduces another major wireless access nightmare: customer objections to service problems.

“When it’s free, they don’t have the same level of headaches if it’s down,” he said. “If someone goes to use their T-Mobile device and then can’t, there are complaints. But if it’s free, the customer doesn’t have much of a leg to stand on if there’s a problem.”

Another analyst?Lance Wilson, director of wireless research for ABI Research?questioned whether the cost of managing wireless access would truly match or exceed the likely fees to be generated and speculated that Krystal’s decision was purely a marketing call based on a belief that its customers wouldn’t likely pay for such a service.

“Because of the nature of its clientele, Starbucks, which is upscale, can charge for [wireless access] and get away with it,” Wilson said. “This chain, they know their customer base very well. Their customers may not pay for it. We probably have here a very savvy company that has correctly interpreted that they would not garner a tremendous amount of revenue from this.”

As for the high costs associated with selling wireless access, Wilson said there are many “automated payment systems for wireless connectivity that are well-entrenched and that can handle [payments] seamlessly. There are a number of vendors that offer these systems. I think this has more to do with their customer base.”

The chain’s wireless access will be free?whatever the motivation?but surfing will have its limitations. The chain is using filtering software from St. Bernard Software Inc. to match requested domains against a list of domains that the ISV thinks are not family-friendly, Reid said.

“One of the concerns we had was that Krystal is family-friendly and we wanted to keep it that way,” Reid said. “We didn’t want someone at one table seeing an image on a laptop at another table” that might be offensive, including weapons or pornography.

But while Reid is proud of the wireless access he’ll be offering his customers, he’s keeping all store systems?including POS, inventory and credit card processing?on traditional hard-wired connections.

The chain opted for DSL and cable modem connections in almost all locations. One site needed satellite for broadband, and it is somewhat difficult to deploy. “It’s almost like a radio transmitter. It needs to be within a mile of the people providing the connection and it has to be line of sight,” Reid said.

As the broadband connections were installed, they disconnected the store’s phone lines?using one of the DSL lines for voice communications, where possible?adding to the cost-effectiveness of the program.

“None of our internal operations are using the wireless. It’s fully segregated from the public traffic,” Reid said. “We didn’t want anybody to sit in our dining room and try to break into our system.”

The internal traffic will be using the public Internet as the pipe, and Reid is confident that Krystal’s VPN will adequately protect the data traffic. But, he said, he is realistic about the lack of a huge incentive for someone to really try hard to break in.

“We try and keep in mind our place in the world,” the CIO said. “We’re selling burgers.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.