Sam’s Club Sees Its Mobile Program Go Up In Fumes

Written by Evan Schuman
November 16th, 2007

With all of the technical and political hurdles in front of retail mobile programs these days, the last thing that a major retailer needs is for rumors of flammability to undercut its retail cellphone program. Alas, that is what is happening to Sam’s Club.

In El Paso, Texas, Sam’s Club gas stations launched a mobile payment program. The consumer was supposed to pull up to the pump, text some numbers on a sign and be told of instant discounts and related deals. It was all detailed on a Sam’s Club sign by the pump.

Customer Raelene Perea said she was about to give the program a shot when a gas station attendant approached her.

"So I took out my cell phone. I though I would find out what this is all about," Perea told KFOX-TV. When she started to text, an attendant stopped her, saying that using a cell phone while pumping gasoline may cause a fire.

The station reported: "More than 24 hours after Perea’s incident at the warehouse club’s station, the signs were taken down" in several nearby locations.

The risk of sparking a fire at a gas station by making a cellphone call seems quite low and industry representatives also play down the risks. But one wonders how this came about. It’s unlikely the employee did this on his/her own. Did someone at corporate approve the mobile program and someone else decided it was too risky?


One Comment | Read Sam’s Club Sees Its Mobile Program Go Up In Fumes

  1. Scott Sanders Says:

    Mythbusters “busted” this urban legend a while back:

    If I remember correctly, they felt that static from getting in and out of the car while pumping gas is much more likely to cause a dangerous spark than a cell phone is.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.