advertisement
advertisement

Self-Checkouts Soar In Euro Supermarkets

Written by Fred J. Aun
October 1st, 2009

Supermarkets across Europe are planning to double their number of self-checkout kiosks within three years, said the Financial Times. The publication said $95 billion Tesco is leading the wave of self-serve rollouts, having installed the kiosks in nearly half of its 2,115 U.K. stores.

Citing research from retail consultancy Retail Banking Research (RBR), the Times report also said that the $30 billion J. Sainsbury chain plans to install about 2,000 self-service checkouts in 250 stores by the end of this year, nearly quadrupling its 2008 number. The $23 billion, 403-store Morrisons supermarket chain reportedly used self-checkouts for the first time in late 2008 and is planning to set up more than 1,000 in 270 of its stores before January 2010.

Wal-Mart-owned ASDA, Europe’s second largest supermarket chain behind Tesco, “has automated checkouts in 99 percent of its stores, where one in five transactions uses the technology,” reported the Times, adding that the chain plans to install self-service units in all of its 346 supermarkets by the spring.

Although soaring, the saturation of self-serve kiosks in European grocery establishments is well behind that found in the U.S. “The U.S. market is far more mature in grocery,” said IHL Consulting Group Founder and President Greg Buzek. More than “80 percent of (U.S.) supermarket brands are using self-checkout today, so in many cases it is a replacement market.” He said the challenge in the U.S. for self-checkout vendors is to see their units used in retail beyond supermarkets, including Home Depot and warehouse-type supercenters.

The U.S. retail market—especially grocery—started embracing self-checkout years before Europe, partially because of the difficulty of finding enough workers to both staff checkout lanes and provide a lot of the services—deli, flowers, bakery, seafood, helping carry bags to cars, deliveries, etc.—that competition from Wal-Mart and others demanded.

Buzek said the number of self-checkouts in all types of retail stores is increasing 10 percent to 12 percent yearly “but the penetration in grocery is likely to be slower than that because a store must do about $300,000 a week to justify the throughput and return on investment.”

RBR predicted that there will be 430,000 retail self-checkout terminals in use globally by 2014, a quadrupling of the current number, and more than half of them will be in North America. It said retail stores in North America have about 80 percent of the world’s self-checkouts, or approximately 74,000 units, while Western Europe has about 15,000 and the Asia Pacific region about 3,000.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.