Starbucks Mobile Deal Chops Its Card Costs

Written by Evan Schuman
August 9th, 2012

In the Square deal Starbucks announced on Wednesday (Aug. 8), the coffee company sharply cut its payment processing costs by turning over all of its U.S. credit- and debit-card processing to the Visa-backed Square. Although Starbucks wouldn’t comment on how deep the savings would be, some are suggesting that the processing savings—not the interchange fees—could be almost complete. Hey, a $25 million investment should be worth a little discount, no?

Also, despite what various media reports implied, when Starbucks starts accepting Square payments right before the holiday sales rush it will not be the mobile phone stays in the pocket customer identified by first name and a POS-displayed photograph approach that Square has done with a handful of smaller merchants. No, the Starbucks approach will mirror the exact method it’s been using for its own mobile payments for years: Customers will display a 2D barcode on their mobile phone, the Starbucks associate will scan that code, and then the store’s existing POS system will handle it normally.

This will not involve a Square sled, either on the customer’s mobile device or on a Starbucks mobile device, said Lisa Passé, director of global brand PR at Starbucks. The customer will have to download the Square app and that will be used to pay, with the displayed barcode being scanned by the Starbucks associate. “We will then be able to seamlessly integrate the Square app into our current point of sale system,” she said.

When asked if Starbucks might eventually adopt some of the more cutting-edge Square functionality, Passé said: “We haven’t talked about exactly what that experience would be.”

The program will also be limited to just the 7,706 U.S. company-operated stores (about 61 percent of all domestic locations) and not the 4,947 licensed stores, such as those in Target and various supermarkets. And Starbucks’ stored-value card—whether used through the plastic version or using Starbucks’ mobile app—is also exempt from this deal.

The deal also gives Starbucks a seat on the board of directors of Square, along with an unspecified equity stake. Whatever that stake was worth before, though, it’s likely worth a lot more now that Starbucks will accept this alternative payment in so many of its stores.

Todd Michaud, formerly VP of IT for Focus Brands (Carvel, Cinnabon, Auntie Annie’s, Seattle’s Best Coffee, etc.) and Director of Retail Technology for Dunkin’ Brands (Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins), knows the restaurant space well and he argues that this is an impressive endorsement of Square.

“So Square gets the absolute biggest merchant in the restaurant space (their core market), they get $25 million (more than a typical contract would have gotten them), a board member with tons of influence in their core market and free advertising at all Starbucks locations?” Michaud asked. “What’s not to love?”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.