Testing Shows Mobile POS Power Supply Sharply Reduces Read Range

Written by Evan Schuman
August 15th, 2012

One of the attractions of mobile payments—especially with in-store mobile POS—is supposed to be speed and ease-of-use. Even if you don’t buy into the argument that it’s faster, it should, at the very least, be as fast as magstripe money. But due to a mobile power supply issue, MasterCard has discovered that retailers using a smartphone as a portable POS may find that customers will need to hold their card right against the antenna, which is hardly the way it’s supposed to work.

The problem, which was discovered in internal MasterCard prototype phone testing, involves the fact that traditional POS is AC powered from a wall outlet, whereas mobile phones are powered by small batteries. (It doesn’t matter if the phone is plugged into the wall, because that AC power merely recharges the battery, which still puts out only so much power for phone operations.) Less power means shorter antenna range, which in turn means that the payment card needs to be almost touching the antenna.

“The read-rate is not what you need it to be, certainly not the 4 centimeters you expect it to be,” said John Verdeschi, Senior Business Leader of Product Development at MasterCard. “Initially, NFC in a mobile phone was envisioned around the consumer using it. But the phone wasn’t built for that. For NFC-capable mobile POS payments to occur, quite a bit of innovation still needs to take place.”

But Verdeschi said that he doesn’t expect this problem to be a major obstacle, with upgrades likely to fix the issue. Also, “the prototypes all worked off phones. A tablet (which has a greater power supply) might work better,” he said.

But Verdeschi added that tablets have their antennae in the back of the unit, an area that is typically resting in a plastic holder, making direct access to that part of the tablet difficult. Then again, if the tablet’s power supply is much stronger, that greater distance may make direct access unnecessary.


One Comment | Read Testing Shows Mobile POS Power Supply Sharply Reduces Read Range

  1. Suzy Says:

    It’s a good thing Mastercard has discovered this issue, because that certainly isn’t good, even if Verdeschi insists that this isn’t a big deal.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.