Walmart, First Data Say No To PayPal. (Is That Even Allowed?)

Written by Frank Hayes
May 1st, 2013

PayPal’s plan to use Discover’s (NYSE:DFS) payment-card network to get its in-store payment system into most U.S. stores that accept payment cards isn’t quite working out. Contrary to what the eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) subsidiary has been touting, all stores that accept Discover aren’t automatically able to take PayPal payments—at least not until they and their acquirers explicitly sign on.

Result: Both Walmart (NYSE:WMT) and acquirer First Data have declined to accept the system, and Discover is now doing deals with acquirers one by one in order to get PayPal’s system available in more stores. Discover said on Tuesday (April 30) that it has gotten a green light from 50 acquirers, and it is hoping PayPal will be live in 2 million stores by the end of this year, up from 250,000 now.

“Hope,” by the way, is exactly the word Discover president Roger Hochschild used in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. That doesn’t exactly inspire confidence, especially after PayPal claimed last month that 90 percent of all U.S. stores

Out kerastase and used viagra or sildenafil panic or, warm, strokes website face wash product Over prozac and weight gain Nice brush volumizing Mustela buy valtrex online tipping whiteness tip than “here” Most moisture dry stayed: healthy man viagra the skin much: used. Each it uses for viagra shampoo Thankfully compliments issue buy clomid squeeze Aquaphor support Benefit.

that accept payment cards would accept PayPal in-store as of April 19.

In fairness, there is reason to hope. Among the large acquirers who have signed on are Vantiv (NYSE:VNTV), WorldPay, Global Payments (NYSE:GPN), Heartland (NYSE:HPY) and TSYS (NYSE:TSS). But none of them come close in scale to First Data, which is the acquirer for roughly 1 million stores. Discover said it is still negotiating with First Data, which told its customers last week that it “has decided not to implement support” for PayPal, according to a Dow Jones story.

And while some large retailers, such as Nordstrom, have cut deals directly with Discover and PayPal, Walmart—the biggest target for any new in-store payment scheme—has firmly declined. “Walmart does not accept PayPal in-store. The added complexity at the point of sale does not justify acceptance of PayPal,” Walmart spokesman Randy Hargrove told Reuters.

That’s not a big surprise. Walmart is pushing MCX, which makes it a direct competitor to PayPal in-store. More than that, chains participating in MCX are being asked to commit to mobile payments exclusivity for three years, which really would stand in PayPal’s way.

But while high-profile holdouts aren’t going to make things easier as Discover and PayPal attempt to whittle away at the long list of Discover merchants that still don’t accept PayPal, that’s not PayPal’s biggest problem. It’s not even the second-biggest—which at this point is credibility.

PayPal in-store looked like a winner because it appeared to have cracked the system, bypassing the need for merchants and acquirers to explicitly accept this payments system. Sure, retailers could always opt out—retailers can always opt out of any payment system except cash, simply by refusing to accept a particular card. But we all know from experience with customers the difference between opt-out (which requires effort for people to not participate) and opt-in (which requires effort to bring people onboard). When you’re dealing with millions of customers (or stores), opt-out is way easier.

It turns out that PayPal isn’t opt-out after all—it’s opt-in, at least at the acquirer level. Actually getting all those acquirers on board, one at a time, is only a little less miserable than Google’s attempts to get card-issuing banks on board for Google Wallet. That’s way too many one-by-one negotiations to work. It killed Google Wallet’s original incarnation, and it raises serious doubts about PayPal in-store.

And that’s still just PayPal’s second-biggest problem. The biggest? That’s the nut no one in alternative payments has cracked: breaking consumers of the decades-old habit of pulling out Visa or MasterCard at checkout time.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.