Windows POS Marketshare Rising, Cost Cuts Cited As Key Reason

Written by Evan Schuman
March 5th, 2009

A new report shows Windows POS OS shipment marketshare increasing slightly, from 71 percent to 76 percent, but the growth comes at the expense of Linux and might be a sign that Redmond pricecuts are being effective.

The IHL Group, which conducted the independent research, had expected to find the economic disaster was giving low-cost Linux a boost, but found the opposite, said IHL President Greg Buzek. “This aggressive pricing and packaging of the operating platform not only took share from Linux, but also took a heavy toll on other legacy operating systems as retailers sought replacements as part of their PCI DSS compliance initiatives.”

On the price front, Buzek said, “Microsoft’s more aggressive pricing actions with their embedded operating systems have made the Linux price argument less appealing.” In other words, by slashing some key pricing, Microsoft was able to negate Linux’s price argument. Once the price factor was removed, Microsoft felt Linux would be in a much weaker sales position.

But some of the answers also were found as smaller vertical niches were examined, in an attempt to explain Linux’s terminal shipment percent dropping from 10 percent in 2007 to 9.2 percent last year. “The macro-economic sectors where Linux is strongest (Specialty and Hospitality) decreased at a faster rate than the segments in which the Windows systems did well,” Buzek said.

Other Windows details from the report were that: shipshare of WEPOS and Windows XP Embedded terminals increased from 31 percent in 2007 to 34 percent last year; and in 2008; and that Windows Vista was used on 13.7 percent of all new POS installations in 2008, “most notably as PCs used as POS terminals for smaller retailers.”

The report said that overall shipments decreased 4.2 percent in 2008, with only Grocers and Supercenters/Warehouse Clubs seeing shipment gains. Other segments, such as Table Service Restaurants and Category Killers (large specialty hard goods retailers) saw the greatest decrease in shipments in 2008.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.