advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

A Mobile Retail Quagmire: The Checkout

August 13th, 2009

Additionally, some users might balk at having their personal information entrusted to anyone other than themselves or their favorite retailer.

There are also some basic mobile device technology issues that impact this part of M-Commerce site design. “Payment is a problem if you think of the phone as being just another browser,” said Impact Mobile CEO Gary Schwartz. “It’s not going to work.” That’s because much of the high-tech functionality on E-Commerce sites that (to an extent) can ease the pain of checkout and payment isn’t available on mobile devices.

“It begins to fall apart at the payment piece because of shipping and traditional forms of credit card payments,” said Conrad Sheehan, founder and CEO of mPayy, a company that enables secure mobile payments through users’ checking accounts. “Checkout in E-Commerce is typically multiple screens. It’s quite difficult to get through that process (on a mobile device). We know of a few major retailers who are thinking through that. One, a very large electronics company, is saying they are not going to do credit cards over mobile devices.”

Sears Holdings, one of the few major retailers with M-Commerce sites that allow payments, makes first-time users of its Sears2Go and Kmart mobile sites go through a pretty routine E-Commerce series of steps including the filling out of forms that seek a ZIP code, shipping address, E-mail address, phone number and more.

The system, though time-consuming for first-time users without a store username and password, seems to work and Tom Emmons, who heads Sears’ mobile group, said it is a better idea than using third-party payment companies. “People don’t want to sign up for anything first,” he said. “They just want to” make a purchase.

Sheehan and others whose companies offer alternative mobile payment technology, including Michael Dulong, SVP of business development at mobile payment platform provider Billing Revolution, contend the Sears approach is too cumbersome. They say mobile commerce must be handled as something significantly different than regular E-Commerce.

“If the retailers want to sell products through mobile, the experience must be optimized for mobile,” Dulong said. “Consumers demand a wide variety of purchase options. They do not want to ‘sign up’ online to have the ability to shop from a phone. The Sears mobile site, as do almost all examples today including Pizza Hut, Amazon, Overstock, Papa John’s, Tiger Direct and Barnes and Noble, requires that users first create an account on the traditional Web via PC or Mac. Then the credit card they provide during the online sign-up is leveraged for mobile product orders. And they still have to log-in with a user name and password from a phone. My mantra is: Don’t send me to the Web if you don’t understand mobile.”

Dulong said mobile shoppers should be allowed to buy things without being forced to enter passwords or PINs and without needing to create user accounts on the Web. “The only sign-up should be buying a product with a credit card or debit card,” he said, adding that such convenience is possible with the latest third-party payment technology that can “remember the consumer” after that first mobile purchase.

But for every upside, there’s a downside: the system described by Dulong would allow everybody using the remembered phone to make a purchase whether they owned the device or not.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.