A Very Cooperative Retail Rebel

Written by Evan Schuman
July 19th, 2006

There are many Web sites today that are designed to empower consumers, often ostensibly against the interest of big business, whether those are major retailers, government agencies or large publishers.

Some of the more interesting ones help consumers get around mandatory free site registration?such as– or get to a human voice when locked inside a voice-system hell (

Some sound rebellious, but they are actually advancing the cause of the big companies in question, such as those that offer “cheats” for videogames or reveal the codes to access DVD easter eggs (hidden videos), both of which have the direct impact of boosting sales for the makers of those videogames and DVDs. Still, they provide tangible benefits by making life easier and more interesting for consumers.

In retail today, though, this online naughty/nice division gets a lot murkier. Last year, there was a lot of attention paid to a series of Web sites that published the ads for Black Friday sales before they were supposed to be published. Leaks from newspaper printing facilities were often the problem and look for many of those sites?including an updated version of, and return this year. But even though several retailers tried to stop those sites from disseminating the sales data early, the sites still promoted those retailers and pushed merchandise the retailer was trying to discount anyway. In other words, there is a huge question mark whether those Black Friday sites ultimately helped major retailers a lot more than they hurt them.

The Black Friday sites last year raised a deeper question, which is whether the effort to keep Black Friday sales secret was an objective that even made sense anymore, given the Web realities.

A similar retail strategy question?which is deeply intertwined with E-Commerce strategy?is the role of the online coupon and the corresponding coupon code. For the purpose of this column, let’s separate all coupon codes into two categories: those that are intended to be for everyone (such as free shipping at for orders worth more than $25); and those that are intended for a limited audience, such as those aimed at infrequent shoppers or consumers who have completed a survey or who have been given a credit.

There are several sites today that publish lengthy lists of coupons, including the aforementioned,,, and But these coupons are overwhelmingly the “intended for everyone” kind, generally grabbed from online ads that the retailers place on other sites.

If the sites were truly renegades of the Steal This Book variety, they would be a lot more interesting, but it would be treated just like any other leak of proprietary information. But they’re not. They are generally actively supported by major retailers and simply consolidate information about discounts that are available to pretty much anyone who asks.

Hence, the question: Do coupon codes?that are intended for everyone–make sense any more? Does a retailer want consumers to not have this information, in the way that product managers’ spreadsheets assume that XX percent of people won’t bother to get their rebate? In most instances, the discounts are intended to encourage sales and there seems to be little reason to not shout them from the highest POS.

So much of retail operations today are based on continuing the way business has been done for years, with no one asking if today’s changing environment makes various procedures no longer rational. If these sites do little more than help retail IT execs and E-Commerce managers question longheld retailing assumptions, they’ll have done some good.


One Comment | Read A Very Cooperative Retail Rebel

  1. Dave Mahadevan Says:

    I am surprised you didnt mention the trading of coupons on eBay (try it just for fun). The guys who invented coupon code (I could be wrong
    here) I think is Staples. They used to have this dollars off coupon codes (buy $150 get $20 off). This got posted on many sites like :
    ecoupons, absurdlycool, hotdlz,, ableshoppers, freebieville, etc. But then Staples cracked down on these sites by warning them and next restricting the coupon code to a single use by using 16 digits. But there are some clever guys out there who actually cracked the code used and post new coupons. The problem is just like us, Staples is also addicted to the coupons and do email
    special dollars off coupon which gets into the net. You can buy these coupons on eBay. For one buck through paypal you can buy a coupon for $15 off $150 at Staples (not a bad deal .. save $14)…

    So check out that eBay …


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.