After WikiLeaks, Pentagon Finally Catches Up To PCI

Written by Frank Hayes
November 28th, 2010

If your employees are complaining about PCI requirements, you’ll be glad to hear that—until this week—even the Pentagon’s classified systems had looser security. On Sunday (Nov. 28), in the wake of the WikiLeaks leaks, the Defense Department announced it was finally disabling the capability to write data to removable media such as thumb drives or disks on classified computers “as a temporary technical solution to mitigate the future risks of personnel moving classified data to unclassified systems.” Translation: We don’t want anyone else copying 250,000 sensitive items to a CD.

That, of course, would fall under PCI-DSS Requirement 9—if the Defense Department was handling payment card data, anyway. Fortunately for the Pentagon, it’s not, so it doesn’t risk having to pay higher interchange fees for transactions. To be fair, the Pentagon already had strict rules in place for the use of removable media on all military computers. It just didn’t use technology to actually enforce those rules—and block reams of classified data from being copied to removable media and then carried out the door by a trusted but untrustworthy user. Not that anything like that could ever happen to retailers.


One Comment | Read After WikiLeaks, Pentagon Finally Catches Up To PCI

  1. Jestep Says:

    Having worked on Confidential and Secret level computers while in the Navy, I find it really difficult to grasp the fact they don’t know who stole the information in the first place. It’s not like these computers are out in the open or accessible from a public network or something. Downloading this much information would leave a massive signature.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.