advertisement
advertisement

Announce Breach. Blink. Be Sued

Written by Fred J. Aun
January 12th, 2010

There is only one thing that is faster than a cyberthief grabbing stolen card data: A lawyer suing that breached retailer. Only 13 days passed from the Dec. 15, 2009, announcement of a breach at social networking application development site RockYou until a lawsuit against RockYou was filed. The case, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco by RockYou user Alan Claridge, asserts that RockYou failed to use even rudimentary security to protect the personally identifiable information (PII), including E-mail addresses, of millions.

“RockYou stored users’ PII in an unencrypted database with poor network security,” Claridge said. “RockYou’s willful failure to secure its users’ sensitive PII led to multiple security breaches that exposed 32 million users to identity theft and other malicious conduct. Although security threats are unavoidable in a rapidly developing technological environment, RockYou recklessly and knowingly failed to take even the most basic steps to protect its users’ PII by leaving the data entirely unencrypted and available for any person with a basic set of hacking skills” to access.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Announce Breach. Blink. Be Sued

  1. Steve Sommers Says:

    Sounds like a possible indurstry in the making: Hacking cardholder data, not with the intent on using the compromised information, but instead with the intent to win the litigation lottery.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.