Another Grocery POS Attack, Compromising Compromise

Written by Evan Schuman
February 26th, 2013

Add Sprouts Farmers Market, a 151-store regional grocery chain that sells in eight U.S. states, to the list of chains learning that POS attacks are today’s favorite cyberthief way to get card data. Sprouts confirmed on February 22 that it found spyware in the POS systems of 19 stores (13 in Arizona, six in Southern California), during a five-day sweep between January 25 and January 29.

This is the latest in a series of physical POS attacks, with victims ranging from Michaels (one of the largest), Barnes & Noble (NYSE:BKS) and Aldi to Stop & Shop and Hancock Fabrics (OTC:HKFI). And these attacks, law enforcement is discovering, are becoming much more sophisticated.

The Sprouts incident very closely followed those earlier attacks. “Certain credit card and debit card numbers (but not PINs) used at those locations only may have been acquired by unauthorized third parties,” said a Sprouts statement. (Isn’t “unauthorized third party” a much nicer name than thief?)

The statement included this wonderfully comforting line for Sprouts’ shoppers: “After an investigation conducted by Sprouts along with FishNet Security, a nationally recognized data security firm, Sprouts is unable to confirm with certainty at this time whether any accounts were compromised.”

That’s a rather perplexing utterance. Given that the chain said data-capturing software was found in the POS systems of some 19 stores, it’s pretty easy to declare the security of every card used in those machines during that timeframe was compromised. That’s not to say that the thieves successfully captured that data in a usable form or that they have actually tried to use that data yet. But in terms of the data being compromised, that debate was pretty much over when the software was found.

The statement then added: Although Sprouts “cannot confirm whether the unauthorized parties were successful in obtaining account information, Sprouts believes fewer than 2 percent of its card transactions in January 2013 were potentially compromised.”

But 2 percent of which transactions? Well, remember all of the POS units in those 19 stores? If it just so happens that the transactions from those 19 stores happen to be 2 percent of chain-wide revenue, then this statement makes sense. But that seems unlikely, given that whole chain is only 151 stores. (If we assume that every store delivers the exact same amount of revenue, those 19 stores should represent 12.6 percent of all revenue. Two percent seems a stretch.) No need for “potentially” compromised. It had the eavesdropping code in the swipe; everything swiped during that time was compromised.

Sprouts also said it had properly completed post-discovery cleanup: “Within hours of discovering the intrusion Sprouts prevented the illegal software from functioning. Sprouts quickly replaced all of the card terminals in question and has worked with the data security firm to strengthen its point of sale procedures in all 151 stores.”

One thing to remember on a breach notification like this: American consumers are the same folk who are wild about lottery drawings. In a data breach, if a chain says only 2 percent were impacted, every shopper (who shopped in stores in those regions during those dates) will assume that 2 percent includes them. Such phrasing—intended to provide most shoppers comfort, that they probably were not impacted—is much more likely to have the opposite impact.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.