advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

As Chain Trials Facial Recognition, Channel Assumptions Flip

July 1st, 2013

With that in mind, let’s look at how Ulybka Radugi is using the technology today. This is a live shopper-interacting experiment.

According to the marketing head of the vendor that the Russian chain is working with, the system uses the video surveillance to supplement or replace a loyalty card. “If the customer has no loyalty card or doesn’t want to identify himself with a loyalty card, then the system recognizes his general mood, gender and age in order to use this data for targeting of the content,” said Ekaterina Savchenko, head of international marketing for vendor Synqera.

The process then gets more complicated. “If the customer identified himself with a loyalty card, the system double checks the customer age and gender with data sourced through facial recognition,” Savchenko said. “If the Synqera system sees that the loyalty card data differs from the camera data, then it evaluates the correctness of the camera data (probability defined for the particular user’s gender and age) and, if it is high, gives it priority.”

The reason this process is both complicated and useful is that CRM cards, despite their intent, are sometimes shared among family members and even friends. The biometrics help make sure that message or promotion being displayed is the right one.

One “trick is to accumulate the user statistics linked to the each unique card number for future sessions. It is based on the logic that the whole family may use one card and, for example, both husband and wife will come to the store,” Savchenko said. “The system will then learn that these few users are linked to one card and base the analysis and relevant content on the facial recognition data.”

A few years back, global food giant Unilever experimented with a vending machine that literally accepted a smile as acceptable tender for ice cream. The Russian trial takes that same idea and brings it into the convenience store aisle.

Ulybka Radugi is using the smile-detecting capability to try and guess whether the shopper is pleased by the message being displayed. (Note: A smile may not mean approval. “Yo, check out this really stupid ad. Who would be so dumb to buy this overpriced thing? It’s so bad, it’s funny.” But for the moment, let’s assume that a smile is a good thing.)

“Users’ smiles are used for the evaluation of the content effectiveness, similar to the way that digital cameras will activate once the lens sees a person’s smile,” Savchenko said, who added that it’s also used in those stores as a way to get a prize of some kind. In those cases, the smile is prompted and rewarded, similar to giving a poppy a dog treat after he performs a trick. “If the user smiles, he gets a virtual achievement badge or extra loyalty bonuses to his card,” she said.

Clearly, this technology has lots of potential to be used in various marketing and even payment means, above and beyond the usual security methods, such as having a way to enforce when shoplifters are “banned for life” for visiting a chain’s stores. But it also has many risks, especially legal risks to the chain.

The privacy—and associated shopper backlash—risks are obvious, but shoppers (especially younger shoppers) seem to have developed an almost infinite capacity for tolerating such efforts. Make the incentive strong enough—and use the data in subtle enough ways so that you’re not forcing the customer to know how far you’ve gone—and privacy will be a trivial concern. Not saying that it should be a trivial concern, but merely our belief that it will be.

There’s also the practical side, which is that facial recognition today is still not that accurate. More to the point, it can be fooled very easily, even by shoppers who are not trying to fool the system.

As one facial recognition trial participant said about a retail trial held earlier this year, that system was often confused by someone choosing to wear sunglasses and not shave.

Like voice recognition, look for this technology to get an order of magnitude more accurate over the next couple of years. In the meantime, though, using it to do anything beyond choosing which ad or discount to display is probably asking for trouble. Or in facial recognition terminology, your next selfie would likely be a big frownie.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.