Avaya Learns An Expensive IT Lesson About Transitioning HR Systems

Written by Evan Schuman
October 29th, 2009

Back in the fall of 2002, $5.3 billion software firm Avaya purchased a brand new human resources database and payroll system. At the same time, it hired a new senior systems analyst. That analyst quickly reconsidered his decision and withdrew his acceptance of the position. Due to a problem with the database transition, the HR database removed him but the payroll system—with its new integrated direct deposit system—didn’t. Yep, payroll kept depositing checks into his account for years, giving the non-employee almost a half-million dollars.

New Jersey prosecutors have charged the almost-employee, Anthony Armatys, with theft, and he faces as many as six years in prison. Given that the checks kept getting deposited for more than four years (from October 2002 through February 2007) makes one wonder how long they would have continued had the systems analyst, according to the prosecutors, not chosen to push his luck. The Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office said that Armatys called Fidelity Investments, said he was an employee of Avaya and asked to transfer funds from his retirement savings account to his personal account. The irony is Avaya’s tagline: “Avaya delivers Intelligent Communications solutions that help companies transform their businesses to achieve marketplace advantage.” Wonder if that always includes payroll systems that don’t stop paying employees when HR deletes them or if that’s just a homegrown extra?


One Comment | Read Avaya Learns An Expensive IT Lesson About Transitioning HR Systems

  1. Sreekumar J Says:

    This is a shocking incident. To be frank, unbelievable! but sometimes truth would be like that.

    One should be very careful when select a HR or Payroll software products. Also utmost care should be given for implementation and go live. IT team should perform periodic audits to find any discrepancies in system.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.