Barnes & Noble Makes Mobile Device Act Differently While In-Store

Written by Evan Schuman
April 29th, 2010

Once upon a time there was in-store and online, and each played in its own distinct world. Then mobile materialized and retailers had to figure out how to handle an online device operating within a brick-and-mortar. On Friday (April 23), the 723-store Barnes & Noble added yet another layer: A mobile device that acts very differently when it happens to be inside one of the book chain’s stores.

For this experiment, Barnes & Noble’s Nook ebook reader will be able to read the full text of any ebooks in the chain’s “more than one million” title electronic library while users are in a physical store. But there’s a one-hour limit per book per day. In theory, a customer could sit with the device in a store and read books for free for 12 hours, as long as they don’t spend more than one hour on any particular book.

Of course, this approach is nothing new; book-lovers have spent hours in bookstores reading dead-tree versions free all day for decades. As a practical matter, most readers will decide within 20 to 30 minutes (or less) if they like a book and will probably stop reading and either buy—or not buy—the book within that timeframe. That suggests the one-hour limit per ebook is quite reasonable.

But the Barnes & Noble concept is truly clever on several levels. First, it does something that store general managers have been trying to do for years: Give customers a concrete reason to come into the store.

Second, it gives the Barnes & Noble ebook reader some functionality that truly sets it apart from rivals such as Apple and Amazon. And with stores in all 50 states, that could prove to be a non-trivial differentiation. Third, it provides an easy one-click way to purchase ebooks the instant the customer wants, leveraging the payment card data and customer name that is already associated with the Nook. (Yes, the chain retains payment card information for faster transactions. Barnes & Noble is taking a scary risk, but it will deliver convenience to customers.)

But the most interesting potential opportunity for Barnes & Noble is data harnessing. From the perspective of a book chain, how valuable is it to be able to quantify customers’ browsing habits? The retailer will know every book a customer flips through and, more importantly, how long that customer spends with each book before making a purchase decision. Do most people stop reading within five pages? Does something happen for many readers on page 11 that makes them suddenly either stop reading or make an immediate purchase?

Before this experiment—which the chain logically calls “Read In Store”—ebooks could detail everything a customer bought (of course). But the ability to give the Nook unlimited browsing capability should deliver quite a return in actionable customer-specific data.

Interestingly, Barnes & Noble is almost in print-versus-electronic equilibrium, with the chain claiming 1.2 million physical books and “more than 1 million but less than 1.2 million” electronic titles.


2 Comments | Read Barnes & Noble Makes Mobile Device Act Differently While In-Store

  1. Lucas Zaichkowsky Says:

    I hope they spent a LOT of time on the security of this to ensure nobody can copy full content of all books. Security not just in the client, but server side input validation as well to protect against attackers that send whtever they feel like sending using their own tools. You don’t have to use a nook to communicate over a network.

  2. Euftis Emery Says:

    Very good idea. Unfortunately for B&N they have one major problem. Lack of eBook content. The official word from B&N is that it takes them two months to move new eBook content delivered from publishers to its FTP to the eBook store.

    However, my personal experience as a publisher is longer. I submitted two of my titles to B&N in Jan of this year and I am…still…waiting for the books to appear on their eBook store.

    Time is money and B&N is currently losing allot of it with its tedious process of displaying new product on their eBook store.

    With this slow process to market, readers looking for new titles…will go to Amazon.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.