Best Buy Customer’s Data Scramble: Even If It’s Not A Breach, Think About The CRM

Written by Frank Hayes
June 15th, 2011

Nothing destroys customer confidence—or E-tailer confidence in a CRM database—quite like this: A New York Best Buy customer logged into his account to discover that the “ship to” address and phone number were changed to someone in Texas. Had his account been hacked? No, a Best Buy customer service rep told him; it was just a database glitch that caused data to be swapped around among customers. Yeah, that’s comforting. But the explanations didn’t end there.

When the customer called Best Buy corporate communications for an explanation, he got yet another story: It was all due to a system test that the customer himself asked for in 2009, when he had trouble ordering a laptop for home delivery. Except that this customer never ordered anything from Best Buy for home delivery. Now he’s left wondering whether Best Buy was hacked, the E-tailer just didn’t bother to warn customers about a database glitch that swapped around account information, or someone really did talk customer service into changing his account information while ordering a laptop in 2009.

The story, at the HD Guru blog, should be even more unnerving to E-Commerce executives than to Best Buy customers. After all, something in Best Buy’s database and logs probably does indicate that this customer bought a laptop in 2009. Or maybe it was the guy in Texas whose information was intermingled with this customer’s.

If the data was scrambled by a glitch in 2009, there’s no easy way for an IT shop to know what happened when. Short of a full-scale (and expensive) forensic investigation, all anyone has to work with is the database and the logs.

If the data was scrambled by a more recent glitch, and that’s how the 2009 laptop purchase by the guy in Texas was associated with the New York customer, it means the glitch hasn’t been cleaned up. And an unknown amount of CRM data is wrong—which makes it worse than useless.

If it was all due to an intrusion or internal sabotage that was covered up in the logs, that’s even more worrisome; it means scrambled CRM data, irritated customers and someone who might return to cause problems again.

It’s easy to dismiss this type of customer complaint, especially when it shows up in isolation. Customers often misremember, they occasionally lie, and they too frequently share account information. Unless there are lots of similar problems reported, we may never hear about incidents like this. They’re all just treated as customer-service issues. Losing the confidence of an E-Commerce customer here or there? That happens. It’s a lot less expensive than tearing into a possibly apocryphal problem in a production database.

But even if you’re not worried about customer confidence, ask yourself: How much confidence would you have in a CRM database you know is wrong?


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.