Best Buy’s Cloud: Wild West Gives Way To Making The Same Data Mistakes Again

Written by Frank Hayes and Evan Schuman
December 7th, 2011

Many chains have seen the cloud as a nice way to get unlimited data storage on the cheap. But Best Buy’s initial cloud efforts revealed something much more fun: a lawless area where IT management didn’t have any rules.

A funny thing happened, though: “Everybody has always said that if we could do the datacenter over again, we’d make no mistakes and everything would be perfect. It would be this incredible Utopian datacenter, except that we’re all making the same mistakes that we made in the datacenter originally, because you go to the cloud like the Wild West,” said Thomas Kelly, Best Buy’s enterprise architect for cloud services.

Kelly, who made his comments at a VentureBeat conference last week in Redwood City, Calif., spoke initially of the short-lived joy of lack of regulation. “That which was not regulated by arch gov [architecture governance] is technically something you don’t have to tell arch gov about. So it was hilarious, because people would say ‘oh, we’ll put it on the cloud.’ We had architects who were interested in the cloud, or we had a consultancy or a vendor that was interested in the cloud, so we ended up with 50 or so applications running on the cloud with absolutely no governance whatsoever,” he said.

That couldn’t last. But once it was time to bring governance back in—not on a project-by-project basis but to build an enterprise infrastructure in the cloud—it was possible to rethink both the hows and whys of IT governance.

“For the first time, we have a clean slate,” Kelly said. “What if we brought all of the existing cloud applications under governance and refactored them into—before it’s too late—a cohesive enterprise infrastructure? We laid down the requirements for a core repository, an ETL2 dataview, mandates for atomic service development. We brought in a really powerhouse gateway with L7. We selectively take advantage of pretty much all of the Amazon data services, for example. We run an L2-backed EMS bus to our back-end datacenter, so our cloud is actually now becoming a hybrid cloud where we’re directly connected for localization to our back-end bus.”

In short, Best Buy didn’t just shove some easy IT functions up into the cloud. It didn’t even simply come up with an IT architecture more suitable to the cloud than the one the company had used for decades. Instead, Best Buy rethought not only governance, but many of the assumptions that had never before needed to be questioned about how to do retail IT.

The problem isn’t just that the Wild West of the cloud needs a sheriff. It’s also what types of rules are appropriate, and what considerations drive them. That’s going to take some trial and error. Fortunately, it’s relatively cheap trial and error. Case in point: Capacity management.

“We are legitimately in a situation where we can be doing as much as 10 to 15 times the amount of volume on our data systems in November than we are in the middle of the summertime,” Kelly said. “We were always building out to Black Friday. However, Black Friday is one day a year, and you have to pay for software and hardware and everything else all year long.”

For online retailers, one month a year is insane for capacity requirements. Historically, IT has had to pay for all that capacity the rest of the time, too. With the cloud, that’s no longer necessary. Scaling up and back isn’t a trivial process. But it beats acquiring, paying for, setting up and maintaining the necessary hardware and software to scale up without the cloud.

That difference in acquisition grief doesn’t stop there.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.