Bin Laden Webmaster Arrested

Written by Evan Schuman
October 11th, 2006

Early Tuesday morning, reports started circulating that German police had arrested a man they had accused of being Osama bin Laden’s webmaster. It was at that moment that I realized how different a war this is and how the Internet?and particularly its multimedia-friendly Web component?has truly changed all.

Imagine if during World War II, French law enforcement had arrested Hitler’s speechwriter? But that’s not even a clean analogy because a speechwriter would presumably help craft the message. This guy, identified in a Reuters report only as a 36-year-old Iraqi named Ibrahim R., is accused of being a programmer and of helping Bin Laden’s Web sites stay up.

But even German authorities know that taking out one HTML wizard isn’t going to cripple the terrorist kingpin with Page Not Found errors. It is, however, an admission that the Internet has become the world’s best communication tool and that the code-mastering artisans who can handle that are delivering to people a weapon potentially more devastating then a dirty bomb.

Let’s look at this from another perspective. In any other war, the ability to drive the enemy into hiding?complete with TSA RFID systems and satellite ability to monitor and track cellphone communications?would be an extremely effective way to isolate that leader and to prevent troops from being rallied and orders given.

The Internet changes all of that. It’s been said that the U.S. often fights the immediately prior war, while creative, bloodthirsty and low budget terrorists are setting the terms for the next war. Allied forces had much superior weaponry and systems, but the enemy had much better PR, morale, community support and, apparently, better code jockeys. Maybe not better code jockeys, but they certainly embraced and used the Internet to a better advantage than have allied forces.

The Internet is a way to talk with the masses and that?handled properly?is a devastating tool. While smartbombs were being aimed at hideouts, why weren’t American hackers overwhelming every Al Quaeda-friendly web site with denial-of-service attacks?

Yes, this is a very different war today. One where a handgun may be less effective than an HREF.


One Comment | Read Bin Laden Webmaster Arrested

  1. Evan Schuman Says:

    The site moderator here, throwing in a comment from a military reader who wanted to remain anonymoys. He made an excellent point, namely that leaving such sites active is a terrific means of intelligence gathering and that U.S. interests are better served by letting terrorists communicate in this way. It is a good point, definitely worth sharing.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.