Blackberry NFC Trial Getting Pushy

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 9th, 2009

As contactless-payment advocates wait (and wait and wait) for widespread public acceptance of cell phones that can take the place of payment cards, vendors and credit card companies keep launching trials. One of the latest, by MasterCard Canada, BMO Bank of Montreal and Research In Motion, involves what appears to be the world’s first use of push E-mail—instead of the more costly SMS—as the method of informing users that a transaction was successful.

The four-month-long trial that began in November is significantly limited in scope, involving only BlackBerry devices. And it doesn’t even involve BlackBerries with payment chips installed. Instead, the effort involves NFC payment chip stickers attached to the backs of the smartphones.

MasterCard Canada, which touted the trial as something that “brings contactless payments via mobile devices a step closer to Canadians,” said the trial entails participants making purchases at any of the 8,500 retailers in Canada that accept MasterCard PayPass. “For the first time, the mobile payment will integrate with the device, with a confirmation E-mail of each transaction sent to the BlackBerry smartphone, including purchase details such as the amount, retailer and date of transaction,” said a MasterCard statement. The company said the PayPass “Mobile Tag” sticker has the same NFC chip and antenna as the regular PayPass card, but it also features “special material to reduce interference between the Mobile Tag and the phone to which it is attached.”

The fact that the transaction details are instantly E-mailed to the BlackBerry, something that can take place over the secure BlackBerry network, separates this trial from others that used NFC payment stickers. Granted, it’s a rudimentary level of NFC/mobile phone integration, at least compared to the type of from-the-factory integration being discussed for the next-generation iPhone. But it’s more consumer friendly than merely issuing payment stickers (that can be affixed to almost anything carried by a user, such as a wallet) and requiring the users to pay for text messages to receive transaction confirmations.

MasterCard said data protection is provided by “robust, multi-level security protections, including the encryption of PayPass radio frequency transaction transmissions and the multiple security protections of the MasterCard payment system.” The card brand added that over 66 million PayPass cards and devices were in use at more than 174,000 merchant locations worldwide by the end of the third-quarter of 2009.


One Comment | Read Blackberry NFC Trial Getting Pushy

  1. Cranston Snoard Says:

    So how would this impact fraud detection routines? Could I be using my PayPass card at one location and my spouse using my “tagged” Blackberry at another store next door?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.