California Law Will Mean More Privacy For Book Buyers—And Much More Paperwork For Booksellers

Written by Frank Hayes
July 21st, 2011

California is about to ban booksellers from sharing information about what their customers buy. The Reader Privacy Act, which has already passed the state Senate and is well on its way to becoming law, would prohibit bookstores—including almost any retailer that sells books—from disclosing what a customer reads unless the customer agrees or a judge orders it.

The legislation reaches well beyond bookstores and physical books, covering audio books and E-readers as well as almost any retail chain that includes a books section. (Barnes & Noble? Definitely. Wal-Mart? Certainly. Safeway? Maybe.) The bad news: Retailers covered by the law will be required to create a detailed, publicly available annual report covering how much customer information was disclosed the previous year—whether it was disclosed with customer approval or not.

The primary purpose of the law is to limit law enforcement and other government agencies from fishing through individuals’ preferences in books—and those are broadly defined. Under the proposed law, a book is “content in printed, audio, electronic or other format, including fiction, nonfiction, academic or other works of the type normally published in a volume or volumes,” which does a good job including audio books, e-books and online content.

The legislation also ropes in many retailers that wouldn’t normally qualify as bookstores: Any “commercial entity” that offers “a service that, as its primary purpose, provides the rental, purchase, borrowing, browsing or viewing of books.” (Note that a retailer doesn’t have to be primarily in the business of selling books for this law to apply. The law kicks in as long as some department of the retailer is devoted to selling books.)

In short, if a California retailer sells books, neither the government nor a third party (in a lawsuit, for example) can get access to the books a customer bought unless either the customer gives explicit permission or a judge certifies that the demand meets certain rigorous conditions. That sounds like a law that’s both customer-friendly and retailer-friendly, especially since details about what customers read can be embarrassing—and if those details are revealed, customers can usually figure out who blabbed.

There’s just one major catch: Every year, each retailer selling books in California will have to publish a report detailing everything the retailer had to do in connection with this law—all federal and state warrants, subpoenas, court orders and requests for information where a customer agreed to the disclosure—complete with counts of every time information was requested, contested, refused or released, all of it in excruciating detail.

Now that’s retailer-unfriendly. What’s worse, it also opens a whole world of unintended consequences when it comes to CRM systems. What happens if a bookseller—like, say, Borders—goes bankrupt and the bankruptcy court rules that CRM data is an asset that has to be auctioned off. Will California fine a bankrupt bookseller for disclosing customer information at the order of a federal bankruptcy judge?

Or what happens when a California retailer is sued in another state, and the plaintiff demands information about who bought what books? Or what if an out-of-state e-book seller like Amazon discloses information about books read by California customers? It’s not even completely clear exactly whether and when a retailer can voluntarily share that type of customer information with an outsourcer for some sort of data processing. Will that require an opt-in by the customer—what the law calls “informed, affirmative consent”—just for handling by a partner?

It sounds like a wonderful idea to beef up book buyers’ privacy protection. But between the paperwork and the uncertainty, this sounds like the type of protection most retailers really hope they’ll never need.


One Comment | Read California Law Will Mean More Privacy For Book Buyers—And Much More Paperwork For Booksellers

  1. Howard Says:

    Don’t understand what the problem is other than the Book Sellers want to make a little on the side by selling information. It wouldn’t take more time and paperwork if the merchant just doesn’t collect the information unless the person decides to provide through a questionairre. The atrical should be renamed to Greed verses Privacy.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.