Can Plug-And-Play At The POS Overcome The Mobile Payments Gap?

Written by Frank Hayes
June 23rd, 2011

One mobile-payments startup has come up with a novel approach for alternative payments: Make it really easy for retailers to add the new technology to an existing POS system. The vendor, Naratte, is getting attention for its Zoosh technology—it uses ShopKick-like high-frequency audio instead of radio signals, so it can mimic NFC-style communication on any phone that can play an MP3 file. But Naratte has also developed an inexpensive plug-in add-on for Verifone and Hypercom POS devices, so a mobile phone sending its signals will look just like a giftcard or payment card to the POS software.

That gives Zoosh instant appeal for retailers that have been showered with alternative payments wannabes, all of which seem to have brilliant business plans that contain just one hole: the part where a customer’s payment-card number gets into a merchant’s POS system with a minimum of fuss. That’s the part Naratte has figured out at a time when anything more complicated than a magnetic strip appears to be beyond the reach of most customers—and many retailers, too.

The advantages to a plug-in for existing POS seems obvious: no POS or back-end software changes, easy testing on a few trial POS devices and a simple path for backing out of a trial (just unplug the add-on). Naratte says its add-on costs about $30; if it’s really as easy to convert a POS device as the company claims, that could cover a critical part of the payment-card-number-to-POS-backend gap.

Then again, retailers have covered that part of the payments gap before for multiple technologies. Retail chains already have plenty of PIN pads that can handle contact Chip-and-PIN and contactless cards at the checkout—and soon, NFC too, if Google has its way.

But so far, getting customers to use anything other than a magnetic stripe has turned out to be next to impossible. Turning the PIN pad into the Swiss army knife of payment has mostly meant that, like a real Swiss army knife, only one blade ever gets used.

Adding yet another blade won’t make Naratte a success with retailers. That will require getting lots of consumers to download and use the Zoosh app on their phones. And cutting deals with card companies to allow card numbers to be stored on the phones. And working out a coupons-and-giftcards business that really will pay the bills without touching interchange fees. And convincing everyone that its encryption makes card data secure enough to pass PCI muster. These guys have their work cut out for them, and any startup with an unusual technology is by definition a long shot.

But if Naratte really can make retail POS integration completely painless, maybe its example can convince other payment wannabes to focus on that, too.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.