Can RFID Be Made Tamper Proof?

Written by Evan Schuman
October 16th, 2005

With so many retailers and manufacturers embracing RFID tracking throughout the supply chain, there is a strong assumption that an RFID label is still connected to the product it is supposed to be connected with. One vendor?Mikoh?is trying to challenge that assumption.

Today’s barcode is relatively easy to replicate and fake with an ordinary laptop, a small scanner and a low-cost inkjet printer. RFID labels are much more difficult to copy but, fortunately for would-be thieves, they are usually quite easy to remove and reaffix to something else.

“There is no physical security in them at all. It’s very easy to move the tags from item to item,” said Peter Atherton, Mikoh’s Chief Technology Officer. “If you look at the benefits that RFID has to offer, those benefits are always greatest when RFID systems are automated to the maximum possible extent.”

What Mikoh has created is a supposedly tamper-resistant seal?dubbed Smart & Secure?that would alert monitoring systems when a tag has been moved or changed. The system has two modes: a lower-cost option that will cause the chip to “stop working altogether”; a higher-cost approach where the chip will proactively alert monitoring systems that it’s been tampered with.

Mikoh’s approach, though, assumes that thieves will steal the RFID label itself. If someone grabbed an RFID-labeled bottle off an assembly line, dumped out its content and refilled it with bogus product, Smart & Secure wouldn’t detect anything, unless the Ricoh label had been sealed over the product’s opening.

For that, Mikoh is developing a line of tamper-resistant containers, Atherton said.

How do thieves try and remove stubbornly-affixed RFID chips? Atherton says a popular tactic is a temperature attack, perhaps by spraying the chip labels with Freon “and they’ll just snap off.” Less sophisticated thieves will use solvents to dissolve away the adhesive or a simple mechanical attack using razor blades.

Jeff Woods, a research vice president at The Gartner Group, is skeptical that the Mikoh products will make much of a difference, but he agrees that the need for making RFID more secure exists.

“There are a number of business cases for RFID and they’re based on the assumption that the tags are secure and authentic,” Woods said. “The asset management case relies on them. Pharmaceutical companies rely on the concept that they’re authentic. It’s definitely an important issue.”

But Woods questions whether the Mikoh approach helps much.

“The question is whether or not the authentication scheme is part of the digital data scheme. Their system doesn’t make silicon any more secure. It just lets you know if it’s been tampered with,” Woods said. “The idea behind RFID is to eliminate human intervention. But, you’d have to visually verify something hasn’t been tampered with so I find it difficult to see how this technology is helpful.”

Woods puts some of the blame on the non-secure nature of RFID with a lack of healthy paranoia used by the original creators.

“In the IT asset management case where someone has lots of computers and phones and wants to verify everything is still there, the problem is it’s still relatively easy to steal inventory and have no one know. RFID tags can be placed on another item and no one will know. In that case, visual authentication systems don’t do much,” Woods said. “The reason this can still happen is that you can clone the tag. You don’t even need to remove the tag. It can just be cloned. The real problem is if the tags aren’t authentic.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.