Card Fraud Soars, But Not Fraud Rate. Thanks To Visa

Written by Frank Hayes
July 8th, 2010

Here’s an interesting stat: As payment card fraud continues to soar each year, the actual rate of fraud—in an X cents per $100 perspective—has remained impressively the same, according to new figures released by The Nilson Report this week. Payment card fraud worldwide in 2009 reached $6.9 billion out of a total of $16.631 trillion in purchases, cash advances and withdrawals. That means card fraud grew 7 percent last year, which is on par with the rough increases from recent years.

From 2002 through 2009, the overall amount of annual card fraud has more than doubled, from $3 billion in losses to about $7 billion. But the card fraud rate—the ratio of fraud to total purchases—has essentially plateaued during those same years, at roughly 4.8 cents. It actually moved from 4.9 to 4.6 to 4.8 and then to 4.7. Back in 1991, that rate had topped 6 cents. In short, this suggests that anti-fraud techniques—especially those from key card brands, particularly Visa—have been much more effective than they’ve been given–no pun intended–credit for.


3 Comments | Read Card Fraud Soars, But Not Fraud Rate. Thanks To Visa

  1. Mark Says:

    Why ‘especially Visa’ – nothing indicates that in the report.

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    Editor’s Note: That was our editorial comment. Visa, for better or for worse, has been the most vigilant and the most vocal on fraud detection programs. We point out the weaknesses of those efforts sometimes and whether the burdens they place on retailers are merited. But fair is fair: these stats indicating that there is a lot right going on with anti-fraud programs and Visa therefore merits acknowledgment.

  3. Ray Says:

    A graph instead of a photo of a wallet would be good.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.