Card Processor Upgrade Gives Grief To UK E-Tailers

Written by Frank Hayes
November 4th, 2010

Thousands of E-tailers in the UK and Ireland had trouble processing transactions last Monday (Oct. 25) after payment processor Sage Pay made a major upgrade to its systems over the weekend. A combination of problems hit the E-Commerce merchants trying to use the new system, including an unfamiliar user interface, different requirements for passwords, intermittent slowdowns in processing and a glitch that reportedly delayed settlements for days with some merchants’ banks. That last one is obviously a major concern; until settlements go through, nobody gets paid.

Even if nothing had gone wrong technically, it’s worth remembering that every time you change what a user has to do, you’re creating slowdowns and glitches. It’s true of E-tailers dealing with processors, programmers with APIs and customers with E-Commerce sites (or even brick-and-mortar stores): Move things around or change the way things work and you may impress some users with your shiny new features—but you will confuse and irritate people whose highly productive habits have stopped working. And to Sage Pay’s credit, it eventually found a temporary workaround for that problem.

Officially, the processor insisted that problems never rose above the level of inconvenience (although merchants who complained about delayed settlements would use a stronger expression). But the company also built the system based on feedback from thousands of customers, showed it to focus groups and ran a live test site for weeks before throwing the switch on the upgrade. At least in principle, Sage Pay did everything right.

But after all the grumbling over the new system, Sage Pay did something very clever: It quickly retrofitted its old user interface with the new system’s processing infrastructure. By Wednesday (Nov. 3) merchants were able to use the familiar interface again—after clicking past a note that warned: “This original version of My Sage Pay is provided for backward compatibility only. We cannot guarantee the availability of this version in the longer term. Please adapt your processes to work with the new interface at your earliest convenience.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.