Check-In Services Glitches Allow Customer Impersonation

Written by Evan Schuman
June 17th, 2010

The increasingly popular check-in services, where users let friends know where they are by “checking in” at specific retailers using their smartphones, have two major security flaws, according to one independent testing firm.

The first allows consumers to easily impersonate other users—and thereby access their rewards, which means the stores are not attracting the consumer they wanted to attract—and the second defeats users’ efforts to go into a confidential mode, where their whereabouts are not supposed to be distributed.

At least one of the check-in services, which include Foursquare, Gowalla and Brightkite, suffers from the impersonation bug, according to Matt Johnston, VP/Marketing for uTest, a crowd-sourced software testing firm. Johnston wouldn’t say which vendor’s products suffer from that flaw.

The impersonation bug involves changing a few characters in the URL. Specifically, the consumer replaces his/her login name with the name of the person being targeted. Getting users’ names is easy, especially if you’re already on one of their lists.

With that URL change—no password is required—the system allows all E-mail and privacy settings to be changed, which should provide access to all data.

The problem with the end-user privacy setting—termed something like “going dark,” “offline” or “off the grid”—is that, according to one uTest reviewer, “if anyone subscribes to this feed via RSS, they continue to see your off-the-grid checkins. So my secret date or job interview is no longer private!”

The vendor with that last glitch, Johnston said, had apparently tried to be thorough in its off-the-grid feature, “as it did shutdown synching with Facebook and Twitter. They considered this, but they didn’t take it all the way through.”

Johnston said the companies with the glitches had been alerted and are in the process of trying to address the problems.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.