Classy Act Of The Week: Best Buy Works Promo Into Breach Notice

Written by Evan Schuman
April 13th, 2011

When Best Buy announced to the world that it—along with many other chains—had exposed some of its customer E-mail addresses by retaining Epsilon, it did so in the traditional proper fashion. But when Best Buy sent an E-mail advisory to its customers, someone at Best Buy thought that adding a commercial in the middle of the breach notice was a good idea.

In the middle of Best Buy’s advisory to customers, someone added a plug for the Geek Squad in the letter signed by Best Buy Chief Marketing Officer Barry Judge. “As our experts at Geek Squad would tell you, be very cautious when opening links or attachments from unknown senders,” the letter said. This tactic raises two issues. First, is the middle of a somber breach notification really where you want a backup group to start humming your jingle? Second, as you are pointing out a major privacy disaster, is this the best time to remind people that you own Geek Squad? Isn’t that like offering children safety tips for Halloween and using those tips to announce you’ve hired John Wayne Gacy as head of security?


2 Comments | Read Classy Act Of The Week: Best Buy Works Promo Into Breach Notice

  1. Jon cameron Says:

    As I read about corporate foibles like this, I often wonder how many salaries went into making such decisions?

  2. Howard Says:

    Best Buy has always been a class act so this comes as no great surprise. Recenty my 88 year old dad bought a PC from Best Buy and paid the Geek Squad to do the intsllation. I had to come out and setup the internet connection. Simply great to take advantage and just plug the thing into the wall.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.