CVS Hit With $2.5 Million Fine For Consumer Data Dumpster Diving Debacle

Written by Fred J. Aun
February 19th, 2009

As punishment for the careless disposal of items containing personal information, CVS Caremark must pay a $2.5 million fine and establish a “comprehensive information security program” to protect both paper and electronic documents containing sensitive data, according to a government settlement announced Wednesday (Feb. 18).

The orders between the chain, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Human Services followed a probe that found workers at the company’s pharmacies tossed into open garbage dumpsters many items containing highly sensitive consumer medical information.

“This is a case that will restore appropriate privacy protections to tens of millions of people across the country,” FTC Chairman William E. Kovacic said in a statement. “It also sends a strong message to other organizations that possess consumers’ protected personal information. They are required to secure consumers’ private information.”

The proposed settlement, open for public comment for 30 days, said the company’s failure to take reasonable and appropriate measures to protect financial and medical information of customers and employees violated federal law.

CVS issued a statement that didn’t say whether it was in the wrong, but did point out that the company has, throughout the case, “expressly denied engaging in any wrongful conduct and agreed to settle the matter in order to avoid the time and expense of further legal proceedings.” CVS is a $2.6 billion retailer, but even so, $2.5 million is hardly nuisance value.

The SEC issued a statement, which includes all of the key elements of the settlement. The commission also published its analysis of the key provisions of the settlement.

In addition to establishing the information security program, CVS must obtain within one year, and every other year for 20 years, an assessment from a third-party professional certifying that the security program is operating sufficiently.

What Can Be Found, Will Be Found

CVS Caremark operates about 6,300 CVS pharmacies nationwide and has a mail-order business. The FTC said its probe was inspired by media reports in 2006 and 2007 about personal information being found in dumpsters in at least 15 cities. The FTC found the discarded material included prescriptions, pill bottles, pharmacy labels, computer printouts, prescription purchase refunds, credit card receipts and employee records. It said the company failed to properly train employees or otherwise take necessary steps to properly dispose of the sensitive information, nor did it have a process for discovering which information was possibly revealed.

The FTC also took CVS Caremark to task for making deceptive and unfair claims to its customers, including “CVS/pharmacy wants you to know that nothing is more central to our operations than maintaining the privacy of your health information.” The proposed settlement bans CVS Caremark from making similar misrepresentations in the future.

In a statement, CVS Caremark said it responded to the media reports “by promptly enhancing its retail waste disposal policies and training programs and instituted a chain-wide shredding program for confidential waste to further guard against inadvertent disposal of confidential information in the regular trash.” The company, which did not mention the $2.5 million fine, said it “is not aware of any consumer harm arising out of, or related to, the alleged incidents” and vowed it “is committed to being an industry leader in privacy matters and places high priority on protecting the privacy of its customers and plan participants.”

Unimpressed with the company’s assertion, “Alarmed About CVS Caremark,” an initiative created by Change to Win, a public employee union-based lobbying group, criticized CVS Caremark’s mishandling of private information. “Consumers expect their private patient data to be protected but it’s not,” said Jasmin Weaver, Healthcare Initiatives Legislative Director at Change to Win, in a statement. “When people find out what corporations like CVS Caremark are doing with their prescription information, they are shocked and rightly so.”

The group noted CVS Caremark has access to private information from about 30 percent of all prescriptions in the country, or 1.2 billion prescriptions yearly. “CVS Caremark touches one out of every two Americans by giving prescriptions or health services to half of all Americans,” said an Alarmed About CVS Caremark statement.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.