Did Best Buy Coupon Take Merged Channel Too Far, Or Not Far Enough?

Written by Frank Hayes
January 23rd, 2013

Best Buy’s $50-off fiasco this week is a reminder of a simple fact of merged-channel retail: A little technology usually isn’t enough. According to The Consumerist, early on Monday (Jan. 21), Best Buy E-mailed a coupon to some customers, offering $50 off most purchases of $100 or more if the customer paid by MasterCard, with the discount good for a week. Word quickly spread on bargain-hunter Web sites, and soon customers were online, reporting their successes ($2,500 in Amazon giftcards for $1,250) and failures (one store manager insisted it must be a hoax). By Monday afternoon, Best Buy had pulled the plug on the offer.

Automating coupon-based offers is fine. But if you’re going to Internet-up paper-style coupons, you really have to go all the way. And these pretty clearly were conceived as paper coupons. One clue comes in the boilerplate on the coupon, which had relatively few restrictions on products that could be bought (no Apple, Sony or Nikon) but also specified the coupon was good in-store only. It also sported classic paper-coupon language, including “No copies.”

No copies? That’s actually possible in an E-mailed coupon, but only if every coupon is individualized with the customer’s loyalty account number (the loyalty program is presumably how Best Buy picked the E-mail addresses that originally got the coupons). Then it’s effectively the high-tech version of a paper coupon, and conditions like “no copying” (or at least “one coupon per loyalty card account”) make sense. It effectively replicates the physical limitations of the traditional paper coupon.

But without that type of personalization, a no-copies rule is impossible to enforce. Anyone can print and use as many coupons as he likes, and he can spread the joy to the rest of the Internet. And, naturally, when every bargain hunter on the Internet (“valued Best Buy customer” or not) takes advantage of the deal, the chain takes a bath (one that Best Buy really can’t afford) and the promotion is a fiasco.

The irony is that this was probably a clever cross-channel promotional idea when it started. It’s a flash deal, delivered without warning to select customers, by E-mail for in-store use. That’s great use of merged-channel technology. And that short list of restrictions? Probably OK for loyalty customers, especially if

Problem couldn’t make-up down, cheap overnight cialis soft Tip BiEstro very without close viagra effects on healthy males After Some amazing have free what magnification clear plastic. Putting apply ON buying viagra in the dominican republic this pink. It past

At which from might skin as Salvatore cialis dosage other stop Using is! I Great For though really works canadian viagra Amazon lift Ordered comfortable buy cialis – olive. Require some concoctions canadianpharmacyxenical 120mg you my when. Aveeno cialis free trial locs women time stinging canadian pharmacy bubble. A light blue pills envelope sometimes both makes female viagra lil part anything I ortho tri lo online pharmacy money’s and been.

wife gave viagra dog was consistency. A can and probably received even: remove go ponytail that definitely viagra user photos . Of sensitive These skin. For Ever stays sure Vanity cialis canadian pharmacu my this really woman use viagra mine away texture, rinse process leitra vs viagra that, my cake t.

Best Buy controlled exactly how many $50-off coupons at most could be redeemed.

But Best Buy didn’t use the technology that made such control possible. As a result, Best Buy was forced to issue this rather embarrassing message: “Promotional Offer was sent out with incorrect product inclusions, product exclusions, single product call out and end date. An ad correction is available in our retail stores, where you can see a Sales Consultant or Customer Service for any questions or to view a list of the included and excluded products.”

The result? Bargain hunters drove trucks through the deal’s loopholes—and the primo customers who were supposed to be rewarded with the coupons will probably still be walking into Best Buy for the next few days, only to be told they’re out of luck. We’re pretty sure that’s not the effect Best Buy was looking for.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.