Digital Signage Growth Boosted by Cheap Hardware, Restrained by Security Costs

Written by Fred J. Aun
March 11th, 2009

The reduction in prices for data storage and electronics goods in general is helping retailer IT departments afford to deploy digital signage and there would be even faster adoption of the technology if data security concerns were more easily addressed, according to an ABI Research report.

The researchers predict the U.S. digital signage market — including hardware, software, installation, and maintenance — will grow by about 33 percent this year. “This report was done in the fourth quarter of 2008,” noted ABI Research analyst Zippy Aima. “At that time, the economy was not in as dire straits as it is now. We might have to revisit some of the numbers, but despite that fact, we are seeing very promising growth.”

The fact that retailers might have trouble choosing a digital signage provider could also be dragging down the technology’s adoption. ABI Research pointed out that the large number of vendors is one of the “factors working against” digital signage.

The researchers also pointed to “data security concerns and a lack of standards” as other growth impediments.

“What really happens, why security is a concern here, is that most of the connectivity is IP-based so networks become prone to being hacked when delivering content,” Aima said. “It’s not that it happens all the time but it certainly raises questions in the minds of content owners. As far as security is concerned, whether it’s securing hardware or software on the network, it’s something you cannot afford to compromise. You basically have to ensure it’s all encrypted.”

The costs involved in security are partially outweighed by the fact that backend networking hardware prices are currently low, she said. Although “the cost of putting up a digital sign network can be enormous,” price drops for required hardware “has seen a decline over the past couple years, which is a good sign,” Aima said.

In addition to security costs, setting up a digital signage system can be complex and time-consuming, stressed ABI Research. “Network management or content management can be very challenging,” said the analyst. “For example, setting up a network can be very daunting. It is important you have all the right components in place to ensure the network operation is very smooth.”

Pushing retailers into digital signage is the fact that “traditional advertising media are losing their appeal for many consumers,” while digital signage “has emerged as a way to deliver highly customized and targeted messaging in a variety of locations. And in a fast-changing world, digital signs’ ability to be updated in real time is a real benefit,” Aima said.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.