eBay Playing, And Losing, The Retail Prediction Game

Written by Evan Schuman
March 6th, 2012

For many years, Microsoft top brass entertained Silicon Valley by predicting when it would release an important application and never getting the date right. Many other ISVs did the same thing, but Microsoft was the master. Microsoft played Lucy to the media’s Charlie Brown. Unfortunately, the company never figured out the huge downside to predicting software releases. eBay CEO John Donahoe is trying to bring back some of that old Microsoft humor.

In Donahoe’s case, he has been trying to predict what major retail chains will do. Back in July 2011, he confidently told investors that eBay would announce a major retail trial by the end of 2011—that was Home Depot, which wasn’t announced until January 2012—and that 2012 would bring 20 national retail trials. Last week, Donahoe slashed that figure almost in half, now saying that 10 to 15 retailers will be offering PayPal in-store this year. Asked to explain the different numbers, he told a TV interviewer: “We tend to under-promise and over-deliver. So no, I wouldn’t say we’re scaling back at all.”

Setting aside the fact that he didn’t answer the question, this is impressive spin. Donahoe had been promising 20 and he’s now scaling it down to 10 to 15, which means he’s now promising 10. That’s not under-promising. It’s over-promising. And it’s not over-delivering, because none—beyond Home Depot—have been delivered yet. If Donahoe announces 28 retailers next week, that would be over-delivering.

The issue shouldn’t be under-promising at all. It should be, “Why is he promising?” Even with eBay paying for everything, retailers will roll out—or not—at the last minute and on their own timetable. Investors understand that and would gladly accept, “We’re talking with several major chains and we’ll tell you as soon as we have anything concrete.”

What Donahoe also didn’t address are the growing security concerns of the Home Depot trial. Home Depot clearly is happy with the eBay-funded effort, given that it made the unusual move of expanding the PayPal offer to the full chain. But will other chains be as happy if their fraud losses are not covered by eBay? Maybe eBay should start releasing its PayPal fraud losses from the Home Depot rollout? Now there would be some stats that 10 to 15 chains might find very interesting.


4 Comments | Read eBay Playing, And Losing, The Retail Prediction Game

  1. Philip Cohen Says:

    So, eBay is buying PayPal’s way into these retail chains. Not surprising. Regardless, that any retail chain would contemplate getting involved with PayPal shows how little they know about payments processing and, in particular, that they know absolutely nothing about the clunky PreyPal.

  2. Tanya Streeter Says:

    What’s wrong with trying to make life a little easier on folks? If I can pay with a mobile number and pin why would I not want to do that? Sure it may be something that seems a little clunky at first, remember the old “Lisa” apple computer? Everything has to start somewhere. And complaining about it illegitimately without facts doesn’t help me, you or anyone else.

  3. Philip Cohen Says:

    A PayPal “mobile” payment is not easier than a NFC card “tap and pay” card payment. And, what is all this constant beat-up of “mobile” payments about, anyway? When you go out, do you take your phone with you but leave your wallet/purse at home? Does your phone have a little pocket to carry your driver’s licence, etc? I’ll take the security of my NFC “chip and pin” MasterCard, in my wallet, any day, thanks …

  4. Philip Cohen Says:

    Oh, and I forgot another material difference between Visa/MasterCard and PayPal at POS, with my MasterCard I can make a “debit” payment or get “cash out “directly from my bank account (assuming I’ve got some funds in the account). See if PayPal, or any of the other “non-bank” payment processors can do that …

    And, when Visa’s is up and running later this year, bank-issued card users (including bank-issued Amex) will be able to pay online by “debit” card. Merchants are looking forward to that possibility …

    In the western world, where suitable infrastructure exists, do we really need any of these “mobile” middlemen complicating the payment process and probably voiding any statutory protections that may have been available to you had you paid directly by a credit card?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.