advertisement
advertisement

EU Considering Data Breach/Privacy Rules With Fines Of Five Percent Of A Retailer’s Annual Revenue

Written by Evan Schuman
December 8th, 2011

The European Union is considering new rules that will enable it to fine retailers as much as five percent of their annual revenue—yep, you read that right—for breaching EU privacy rules. The rules would also cover the protection of payment-card data.

Reality check: It’s only a proposed rule at this stage—it’s slated to be introduced in January—and it’s not clear how much enforcement authority it would have over Asian or North American retailers whose only connection to Europe is selling to European consumers from their home countries (as opposed to having a physical presence in Europe).

If enacted with enforcement teeth, this could be huge. Not only are the threatened amounts (at least the ceiling) orders of magnitude beyond what major U.S. chains have been threatened with by card brands and processors, but the threats are far more realistic. No one at Wal-Mart really fears that a bad data breach would mean the chain wouldn’t be able to accept Visa anymore, and the fines are kept modest for the big boys given the nature of their business relationship. But the EU would have no such hesitation in leveling these fines, especially when the it gets to keep the much needed money. Think of a small-town police officer whose town is about to lay off cops due to budget cuts, unless revenue can be raised quickly. And the officer sees a speeding car with out-of-state plates. If this EU measure gets passed and you get breached, you’re that speeding car with the out-of-state plates.

The original report in The Financial Times in London said this would be “the first significant update of data protection legislation since 1995.” But final approval, the story said, could “take at least two years, with another two before the measures come into effect.” And government approvals—especially from Germany—are not a given, meaning that the policy could be significantly weakened or killed.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.