ExxonMobil Discovers That A PCI Deadline Is A Deadline, Unless It Isn’t

Written by Evan Schuman
May 26th, 2010

PCI deadlines are to be taken seriously, unless you’re $285 billion ExxonMobil with it approximately 2,200 gas stations in the U.S. Then it’s more like a suggestion.

Visa has given ExxonMobil branded retailers an extension from July 1, 2010, until Dec. 31, 2010, to update their EPOS systems, according to a report in NACS (National Association of Convenience Stores) Online. Exxon Branded Wholesale Manager Chris Mahoney is quoted saying Visa and the oil company’s acquiring bank “recognize the challenges you face to be PCI-compliant by July 1, 2010, and have agreed to extend your compliance date.”

The story adds: “The new deadline means that POS devices that are designated ‘end-of-life’ by Exxon (Gilbarco G-Sites, Ruby without Sapphire and the Omni 3300) must be replaced or upgraded by December 31 with certified devices (Wayne Nucleus, Gilbarco Passport, Ruby Sapphire, Allied Pinnacle, AlliedRetalix or Vx570). All other POS devices that do not meet PCI requirements must be upgraded by August 1, 2012.”

It goes on to say ExxonMobil has to continually show progress: “Failure to demonstrate appropriate progress may result in fines or penalties from Visa which may be passed on.”

This change is a big part of the perception problem with PCI enforcement. Deadline exceptions need to be rare. But when they happen, they should be announced by the card brands—not via a leaked letter—along with the specific reasons for the extension.

Such an approach will make retailers more hesitant to seek an extension—who waits to air their dirty compliance delay laundry? But, more importantly, it will help other retailers take the deadlines seriously. Rumors of favored players getting inconsistent extensions are not going to be helpful to the cause.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.