advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Federal Judge Rips Into Best Buy Loss Prevention VP

December 23rd, 2010

The judge continued: “This was Best Buy’s culture, and you can’t have a group of people who are a significant portion of what Best Buy does doing this and no one knows anything about it. Don’t do an end-run on me and say, ‘My goodness, I don’t know what’s going on and my CEO doesn’t know what’s going on, my CFO doesn’t know what’s going on, the supervisors don’t know what’s going on.'”

Stone (who, to his credit, opted to not say “Whoa. I don’t get paid nearly enough to take this crap”) then bravely asked if he could respond. He argued that Best Buy has some 186,000 employees and that Loss Prevention is a relatively small team. He said the former Best Buy manager who was charged—Robert Paul Bossany—had not cooperated with Best Buy’s internal investigation.

“You’re right. I mean, it’s certainly not information we would like to have out in public. But we felt a duty because of the fact that this is one rogue department that stretched the rules, they stretched the boundaries of our ethics policy and essentially benefitted [several] vendors,” Stone said.

Stone cited as an example of the fraud that Bossany approved a $240 invoice for a $24 part. (He strangely told the judge that $240 is “more than 12 times” $24. Guess the judge flustered him more than he realized.)

Many of the details of the case involved a vendor called Chip Factory and its activities between 2004 and 2007. The case was one where the vendor won business with low bids, but then charged much more. The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported on one instance where “Chip Factory bid $69 for a computer screen and then charged Best Buy $1,699 for it.”

The judge eventually sentenced the president of Chip Factory, Russell Cole, to 15 years in prison. He also sentenced Bossany, who had been a Best Buy vendor relations manager, to 7-and-a-half years in prison. Bossany’s sentence was reduced because he wore a wire to secretly record conversations with some of the vendor executives involved, in cooperation with federal investigators.

Best Buy issued a short statement saying that “Since learning of this scheme back in 2007, we made significant changes to our processes to help ensure that this type of fraud does not occur again.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.