Feds Cracking Down On Bank Giftcards, Retail-Issued Giftcards May Be Next

Written by Evan Schuman
August 16th, 2006

Federal regulators on Monday clamped down on bank-issued giftcards, forcing the banks to much more prominently disclose expiration dates and any inactivity fees. Industry observers expect federal authorities to soon extend such rules to retailer-issued giftcards.

?The gift card market is growing rapidly, and the terms and conditions of various cards can vary widely,? said Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan. ?It?s very important that national banks engaged in this business adopt robust disclosure policies so that consumers understand what they are getting when they buy or receive a gift card.?

The government guidance said that bank giftcards “must put the expiration date on the front of the card, disclose the amount of any monthly maintenance or inactivity fees, and provide a phone number or Web address.” Those giftcard-issuers must also take steps to make sure that the users of those cards know that information because the card purchasers are often not the consumer that will ultimately use the card.

“Issuers should not advertise a gift card as having ‘no expiration date’ if monthly service or maintenance fees, dormancy fees or similar charges can consume the card balance,” a government statement said. “Similarly, if fees may consume the card balance before the stated expiration date, disclosures related to that expiration date should explain that possibility. Issuers should also avoid describing gift cards as if they are gift certificates or other payment instruments more familiar to consumers.”

The issue is less one of consumers being misled and more of retailers trying to navigate a series of complicated state and federal tax rules for handling such payment forms. “Merchants apply expiration dates and inactivity fees to giftcards as a direct result of state escheatment laws, which require giftcard issuers to return the unused portion of a giftcard to the state as tax after a certain period of time,” said Bruce Cundiff, a senior analyst for Javelin Strategy & Research and a former Jupiter Research analyst. “If merchants (and banks, for that matter) were able to recognize giftcard revenue at the time of the sale (rather than at the time of redemption), there would be little motivation to apply expiration dates or inactivity fees. The goverment, for its part, sees a lucrative source of revenue and wants to protect it. It’s rather hypocritical to position the action taken as ‘helping consumers.'”

These rules could actually help retailers as few retailers want to make a lot of money from keeping unspent giftcard dollars. First, the tax and related business issues make the money less profitable but the much greater concern is that a gift card’s objective is to encourage more consumer spending and merchant loyalty. A card that dies with cash on it represents dollars not spent, up sell opportunities lost (where a consumer uses a $25 giftcard to pay for part of a $50 product) and likely yields a very unhappy customer.

With many retailers today?such as Subway–merging giftcards with CRM and loyalty cards, the incentives to very fully disclose giftcard limits become extreme. Let’s say a consumer has a $25 giftcard and uses $23 of it, leaving a $2 credit. That consumer might be inclined to toss it in a drawer and forget about it. What if the merchant could E-mail that consumer and say, “We notice that you have $2 left on your giftcard. If you come in and use it in the next two weeks, we’ll quintuple that owed amount.” For a nomimal $10 cost, the retailer will likely bring the customer back in and boost loyalty.

“This is sort of a shot across the bow” of retailers that issue giftcards, Cundiff said, adding that the Federal Trade Commission might get involved in issuing rules for merchant giftcards. “It’s a nightmare for merchants to handle” the tax tracking across many states and federal agencies, he said.

Another analyst?Paula Rosenblum of the Retail Systems Alert Group?said much of this comes down to consumer perception. “It is certainly better to inform customers up front about charges, fees and expiration dates than to surprise them after the fact,” Rosenblum said. “It would be a shame if consumers? jaundiced view of rebate programs got extended to gift cards as well. Gift cards have been so well received it would be a pity if sleight of hand created ill will.”


2 Comments | Read Feds Cracking Down On Bank Giftcards, Retail-Issued Giftcards May Be Next

  1. Louann Says:

    I think is is ridiculous the balance of the card would go to taxes; that leaves an open door for politicians to exploit theses cards. The person is already paying taxes on the items they purchase with these cards. The money should stay on the card and NOT go to taxes. The government takes too much of our money now, and the politicians already think our money is their private PIGGY bank.
    I like Subways idea, it serves 2 purposes; 1. That card does not sit around forever. And 2. Builds customer loyalty. I would definitely buy a Subway gift card. WOW Great food, and a great gift card deal.

  2. Elish Meyers Says:

    Escheat is not actually a tax-it is a method of “holding” unclaimed property for the true owner. If a gift card owner realizes s/he forgot to spend $10 on a card 3 years after it was sent to the state for “holding” a claim is filed with the state and the money is returned to the owner. This is not generally done as people forget and so the money ends up with the state long-term. Does the state use the escheated dollars? Yes. But typically a reserve is kept to pay out claims. Unless the state is Californina. CA has been issuing IOU’s for unclaimed propery claims.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.