Fidelity Tells Customers It’s Shutting Down Self-Service Kiosks

Written by Evan Schuman
February 25th, 2010

Traditionally, when a retailer rolls out upgraded customer-facing hardware—be it an ATM, self-checkout machine or perhaps a price-checking kiosk—the chain says nothing until it has installed the new systems. Then it can discuss the benefits the new apparatus offers the customer. Fidelity Investments apparently chose to break with tradition.

This month, an electronic message started appearing on automatic deposit machines telling investors that the machines were being “decommissioned” early this year. Some store associates added that the timing would be more like May or early summer.

At first, this seemed an ordinarily unusual move, as few chains that have made the investment in self-service machines (Fidelity started rolling them out 10 years ago) bother to yank them out. But then Fidelity tried to explain the move, and what seemed merely unusual became positively surreal.

Fidelity, after being contacted, E-mailed a statement saying that “we are currently transitioning to new technology to better suit customer needs.” Fair enough, but what new technology? The company wouldn’t specify.

Fidelity spokesperson Teri Ginsburg said that the current kiosks will be removed the first half of this year and that—for an unspecified “period of time”—customers will have no automated assistance. She said that “new technology” and a “new approach” would be brought in that was “not a machine” and would be “not a direct replacement” for the self-service kiosks.

Asked why they didn’t wait for the new units, Ginsburg said the removal of the old units would make it easier to put in the new technology.

Either way, why announce to all customers—months before it’s slated to happen—that some hardware is being discontinued? What’s the point? It doesn’t help the consumer or the chain. We are waiting to hear more answers from Fidelity as to what the new approach is. Either way, this seems like a bizarre way to transition self-service approaches.


One Comment | Read Fidelity Tells Customers It’s Shutting Down Self-Service Kiosks

  1. Todd Ablowitz Says:

    Interesting story. Evan- do you think this could be due to some sort of fraud that was happening? Did you probe on that area? When something seems to make no sense on the surface, one has to wonder what one does not know. I can easily believe there’s a new technology they want to implement, but I agree with the question you pose… why would they rip out the old one before the new one’s ready? Fishy.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.