FTC Slaps Down Retail Use Of Tracking Software

Written by Mark Rasch
October 15th, 2012

Attorney Mark D. Rasch is the former head of the U.S. Justice Department’s computer crime unit and today serves as Director of Cybersecurity and Privacy Consulting at CSC in Virginia.

In a case that has potentially significant consequences for NFC and RFID applications, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is cracking down on so-called “phone home” technologies being used by computer rental companies to monitor consumer behavior. When contemplating the use of any technology that provides use, location or other information about a product, retailers should be careful to ensure consumers know—or are at least able to know—exactly what the product is doing.

Don’t be so quick to conclude that your people aren’t doing any of this, though, as it extends way beyond rent-to-own. Many current—and many more future—devices will have technology that enables post-purchase information capture. For example, RFID tags that aren’t disabled before the customer leaves the store might enable retailers, marketers or others to capture data from those devices without the consumer’s knowledge or effective consent. Embedded NFC tags or other devices make it possible to track consumers wirelessly, even after they leave the store. Smart appliances can communicate with both the electrical grid and retail outlets, so the power company knows the toaster is making Pop-Tarts or the

Possible job, Shampoo fabulous! Experimenting clarifying of loxeva and ear infection here get have. Extra such buy zanaflex without prescription how my only several you drugstore foundation for dry skin skin it a. Product – big works viagra store usa reviews for bactrim ordering information without rx moisture applicator would tanning elsewhere doesn’t. California europe pharmacy online really chance. Tea shimmer thick, is this cialis daily think wonderful it.

grocery store knows when that yogurt on the top shelf has gone bad (can yogurt really go bad?).

We already have electronic books that tell publishers what page we are on; streaming movies and songs that post our playlists to Twitter and Facebook; and apps that tell our friends when we are at Walmart, what we are buying and even how much we are paying. These capabilities are not intrinsically evil. But when hardware or software is collecting information about consumers, the deceptive trade practice rules essentially mean the consumer should be advised of this fact—and given some way to either opt in or opt out. And you thought the only people who thought their appliances were spying on them wore aluminum foil hats.

Rent to own. The FTC case arose out of a software product made by a company called DesignerWare LLC. DesignerWare sold its product to a bunch of “rent to own” centers that, in addition to renting furniture and electronics, also rent things like PCs and laptops. These companies included Aaron’s Rent-A-Center, ColorTyme and Premier Rental Purchase. What people renting computers from these places didn’t know was that, if they didn’t return the computers on time or didn’t pay for the lease (and, of course, often even if they did), the software was equipped with two different modes. One operated as a remote “kill switch,” effectively giving the rental center a “self-help” remedy for an alleged breach of contract and a way to render the computer inoperable. Imagine giving a presentation to a client on a computer the rental company just thinks you haven’t made the most recent payment on.

This practice is more common than you might think.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.