Homeland Security Filing: Secret Service IT Systems “Prone To Failures”

Written by Evan Schuman and Fred J. Aun
March 4th, 2010

Given that global cyberthief rings tend to be well-financed and use the latest in technology, it’s critical that the lead federal law enforcement agency responsible for chasing them—the U.S. Secret Service—be at least as well equipped. Indeed, its Web site reports that the Secret Service “uses the latest in high-tech equipment to deter, detect and respond to criminal threats.” Unfortunately, when the Secret Service went seeking technology help from the vendor community, it told a very different tale.

“Currently, 42 mission-oriented applications run on a 1980s IBM mainframe with a 68 percent performance reliability rating. Networks, data systems, applications and IT security do not meet current operational requirements,” said an Oct. 16, 2009, Secret Service contracting memo, according to an report. “The IT systems lack appropriate bandwidth to run multiple applications to effectively support USSS (U.S. Secret Service) offices and operational missions around the world.”

The Secret Service’s parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, in its budget justification for this year, also told of inadequate IT systems.

“The Secret Service data environment is fragile and cannot sustain the tempo of current or future operational missions. The existing hardware infrastructure is more than five years old and is prone to failures,” said the filing, according to a copy on the DHS Web site. “The operating system software code is a couple of versions old and is soon expected to be no longer supported by the manufacturer. A loss of a server or a software component corruption would result in extended downtime and a potential loss of mission-critical data. The current hardware capacity to support any new applications and the increase in volume of data is very limited. The database server hardware is at the end of its lifecycle.”

The money DHS requested was supposed to fund the ability to “replace or upgrade existing, outdated database hardware and software components for enterprise-wide database systems and introduce high availability, fault tolerance, optimal performance and scalability at all layers in the technology stack. The core database upgrade will provide the Secret Service with a robust infrastructure to handle growing data processing needs. The expanded infrastructure will have new database servers, new ETL (extract, transform and load) servers, database and system monitoring toolssumo wrestling game, more storage to handle a growing volume of data for existing applications and newer data marts and Business Intelligence repositories.”

The mainframe capabilities from the Secret Service are crucial, given the heavy number-crunching needs of cybercrime tasks. Many retailers rely on the Secret Service to detect patterns in payment card transactions when they are trying to track down cyberthieves. As more chains—and card brands—cooperate globally, the petabytes of data to be analyzed will feature trillions of payment and bank transactions daily.

That type of pattern recognition across vast data warehouses is the specialty of big iron, which is why it’s crucial that the Secret Service have as much CPU data-crunching power as practical. We know they’ll be routinely outgunned and outspent by the bad guys. It would be nice to believe they aren’t chasing after thieves while crunching numbers on an abacus.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.