Expedia The Latest E-Commerce Victim Of A New Kind Of Retail Security Threat: Car Thieves and Burglars

Written by Evan Schuman
June 4th, 2006

More than a quarter-of-a-million customers are now at high risk for credit card theft after a password-protected laptop computer containing their credit card information was stolen from an Ernst & Young auditor?s locked car in what appears to be a ?randon petty theft,? a spokesperson was quoted as telling the Associated Press.

The Seattle incident at, a subsidiary of, is just the latest in a series of information-theft cases recently centering not around criminal hackers but around the garden-variety thug breaking into locked places.

In California on Friday, the acting commissioner of the state?s Department of Financial Institutions was demoted and an employee he supervised fired after that employee?s laptop?containing data on 232 people and 216 businesses?was stolen from his car. His offense, according to the Associated Press, was having left the computer in the car and for having not encrypted any of the data.

This all comes on the heels of last month?s Veterans Affairs theft, where the unencrypted personal data of some 26.5 million veterans was stolen when a laptop was taken during a home burglary of a VA employee. The VA is now saying that a lot more information was grabbed than initially revealed, according to the Associated Press.

Yet again on Saturday, the AP tells us of information from active-duty personnel in those stolen VA files..

The pattern here is simple and disturbing, but not especially surprising. Laptops and now high-end PDAs are making it easier for employees to work outside of the office, USB drives with more than a Gigabyte of data can fit comfortable in a shirt pocket and the proliferation of wireless networks is making it so easy to work in the field and at home.

But employees?especially those working with customer E-Commerce data?must simply adhere to the standard security protocols they?ve always known. That means everything is encrypted as soon as physically possible. It absolutely means that data must be treated as the valuable treasure that it is. Would employees have left stacks of $100 bills in their cars, in plain view? To a car thief or just an experienced thug, that?s what a nice portable laptop looks like.

I?m a bit more paranoid than most, but when traveling, I never leave my laptop in my room. Lugging it to meetings and interviews isn?t fun, but it sure beats the alternative.

As for burglaries in the home, that?s a bit trickier. In that case, the data simply needs to be religiously backed up and stored in multiple locations and encrypted.

My biggest fear is wireless. Cellphones operating as wireless modems and wireless connectivity throughout is just begging for the next wave of identity theft to be airborne. E-Commerce workers must understand that. I assure you that data thieves do.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.